From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@android.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] driver core: Fix handling of fw_devlink=permissive
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 09:29:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200331072910.GC854501@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGETcx8aW-EY+bGEPr+20bZUF-=ghZDPyQ8AdU7eYYd-wOvekA@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 11:18:01PM -0700, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 10:43 PM Marek Szyprowski
> <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 2020-03-31 04:28, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> > > When commit 8375e74f2bca ("driver core: Add fw_devlink kernel
> > > commandline option") added fw_devlink, it didn't implement "permissive"
> > > mode correctly.
> > >
> > > That commit got the device links flags correct to make sure unprobed
> > > suppliers don't block the probing of a consumer. However, if a consumer
> > > is waiting for mandatory suppliers to register, that could still block a
> > > consumer from probing.
> > >
> > > This commit fixes that by making sure in permissive mode, all suppliers
> > > to a consumer are treated as a optional suppliers. So, even if a
> > > consumer is waiting for suppliers to register and link itself (using the
> > > DL_FLAG_SYNC_STATE_ONLY flag) to the supplier, the consumer is never
> > > blocked from probing.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 8375e74f2bca ("driver core: Add fw_devlink kernel commandline option")
> > > Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
> > > ---
> > > Hi Marek,
> > >
> > > If you pull in this patch and then add back in my patch that created the
> > > boot problem for you, can you see if that fixes the boot issue for you?
> >
> > Indeed, this fixes booting on my Raspberry Pi3/4 boards with linux
> > next-20200327. Thanks! :)
>
> Hi Marek,
>
> Thanks for testing, but I'm not able to find the tag next-20200327. I
> can only find next-20200326 and next-20200330. I was just trying to
> make sure that next-20200327 doesn't have the revert Greg did. I'm
> guessing you meant next-20200326?
>
> > Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Greg,
>
> Can you pull in my fix and then revert the revert?
After 5.7-rc1 is out I will, thanks.
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-31 7:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-21 21:03 [RFC PATCH v1] driver core: Set fw_devlink to "permissive" behavior by default Saravana Kannan
[not found] ` <CGME20200327102554eucas1p1f848633a39f8e158472506b84877f98c@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2020-03-27 10:25 ` Marek Szyprowski
2020-03-27 11:30 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-03-27 15:21 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-03-27 18:30 ` Saravana Kannan
2020-03-30 6:20 ` Marek Szyprowski
2020-03-30 18:41 ` Saravana Kannan
2020-03-31 2:28 ` [PATCH v1] driver core: Fix handling of fw_devlink=permissive Saravana Kannan
2020-03-31 5:43 ` Marek Szyprowski
2020-03-31 6:18 ` Saravana Kannan
2020-03-31 7:07 ` Marek Szyprowski
2020-03-31 7:29 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2020-04-16 18:25 ` Saravana Kannan
2020-04-28 15:52 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-04-28 18:27 ` Saravana Kannan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200331072910.GC854501@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).