linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Lamowski <benjamin.lamowski@kernkonzept.com>
To: xiaoyao.li@intel.com
Cc: bp@alien8.de, fenghua.yu@intel.com, hpa@zytor.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, luto@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	nivedita@alum.mit.edu, pbonzini@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	philipp.eppelt@kernkonzept.com, sean.j.christopherson@intel.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, tony.luck@intel.com, x86@kernel.org,
	Benjamin Lamowski <benjamin.lamowski@kernkonzept.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/1] x86/split_lock: check split lock support on initialization
Date: Mon,  6 Apr 2020 18:17:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200406161737.258840-1-benjamin.lamowski@kernkonzept.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200406160247.208004-1-benjamin.lamowski@kernkonzept.com>

While the sld setup code is run only if the TEST_CTRL MSR is available,
the current sld initialization code unconditionally resets it even on
systems where this architectural MSR is not available.

This commit introduces a new default sld state sld_unsupported, which is
changed in split_lock_setup() only if sld is available; and checks for
split lock detect support before initializing it.

Fixes: dbaba47085b0c ("x86/split_lock: Rework the initialization flow of split lock detection")
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Lamowski <benjamin.lamowski@kernkonzept.com>
Suggested-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c | 17 +++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
index 9a26e972cdea..de45ba1089c1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
@@ -34,17 +34,18 @@
 #endif
 
 enum split_lock_detect_state {
-	sld_off = 0,
+	sld_unsupported = 0,
+	sld_off,
 	sld_warn,
 	sld_fatal,
 };
 
 /*
- * Default to sld_off because most systems do not support split lock detection
- * split_lock_setup() will switch this to sld_warn on systems that support
- * split lock detect, unless there is a command line override.
+ * Default to sld_unsupported because most systems do not support split lock
+ * detection. split_lock_setup() will switch this to sld_warn on systems that
+ * support split lock detect, unless there is a command line override.
  */
-static enum split_lock_detect_state sld_state __ro_after_init = sld_off;
+static enum split_lock_detect_state sld_state __ro_after_init = sld_unsupported;
 static u64 msr_test_ctrl_cache __ro_after_init;
 
 /*
@@ -1033,6 +1034,9 @@ static void __init split_lock_setup(void)
 	case sld_fatal:
 		pr_info("sending SIGBUS on user-space split_locks\n");
 		break;
+	case sld_unsupported:
+		/* Can't happen, just to keep the compiler happy */
+		break;
 	}
 
 	rdmsrl(MSR_TEST_CTRL, msr_test_ctrl_cache);
@@ -1063,7 +1067,8 @@ static void sld_update_msr(bool on)
 
 static void split_lock_init(void)
 {
-	split_lock_verify_msr(sld_state != sld_off);
+	if (sld_state != sld_unsupported)
+		split_lock_verify_msr(sld_state != sld_off);
 }
 
 bool handle_user_split_lock(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code)
-- 
2.25.1


  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-06 16:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-25  3:09 [PATCH v7 0/2] Fix and optimization of split_lock_detection Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-25  3:09 ` [PATCH v7 1/2] x86/split_lock: Rework the initialization flow of split lock detection Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-28 16:32   ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-30 13:26     ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-30 14:26       ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-25  3:09 ` [PATCH v7 2/2] x86/split_lock: Avoid runtime reads of the TEST_CTRL MSR Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-28 16:34   ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-29  9:13     ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-30 18:18       ` Sean Christopherson
2020-04-03 17:44 ` [PATCH 0/1] x86/split_lock: check split lock feature on initialization Benjamin Lamowski
2020-04-03 17:44   ` [PATCH 1/1] " Benjamin Lamowski
2020-04-03 18:01     ` Sean Christopherson
2020-04-06  8:23       ` Benjamin Lamowski
2020-04-06 11:48         ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-04-06 15:57           ` [PATCH v2 0/1] x86/split_lock: check split lock support " Benjamin Lamowski
2020-04-06 16:02             ` [PATCH v2 1/1] " Benjamin Lamowski
2020-04-06 16:17               ` Benjamin Lamowski [this message]
2020-04-06 21:24                 ` [PATCH v3 " Thomas Gleixner
2020-04-06 21:21   ` [PATCH 0/1] x86/split_lock: check split lock feature " Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200406161737.258840-1-benjamin.lamowski@kernkonzept.com \
    --to=benjamin.lamowski@kernkonzept.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=nivedita@alum.mit.edu \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=philipp.eppelt@kernkonzept.com \
    --cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).