linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] rbtree_latch: quit searching when reaching to maximum depth
Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 15:00:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200515130030.GV2957@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200515124710.16439-1-laijs@linux.alibaba.com>

On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:47:06PM +0000, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> lib/rbtree.c has ensured that there is not possible to
> inadvertently cause (temporary) loops in the tree structure
> as seen in program order of the modifier. But loop is still
> possible to be seen in searcher due to CPU's reordering.
> 
> for example:
> modifier				searcher
> 
> left rotate at parent
> parent->rb_right is node
> 					search to parent
> 					parent->rb_right is node
> 				     +->see node->rb_left changed
> WRITE_ONCE(parent->rb_right, tmp);-+ |  node->rb_left is parennt
> no smp_wmb(), some arch can        | |
> reorder these two writes           | |  loop long between
> WRITE_ONCE(node->rb_left, parent);-+-+  parent and node
> 				   |
> 				   +--->finally see
> 					parent->rb_right
> 
> The long loop won't stop until the modifer's CPU flushes
> its writes. Too avoid it, we should limit the searching depth.

Cute, have you actually observed this? Did you have performance issues?

> There are no more than (1<<BITS_PER_LONG)-1 nodes in the tree.
> And the max_depth of a tree is no more than 2*lg(node_count+1),
> which is no mare than 2*BITS_PER_LONG.
> 
> So the serarch should stop when diving down up to
> 2*BITS_PER_LONG depth.

Arguably you can have a larger key space, but I think due to memory
constraints this limit still isn't wrong. But I do feel you need a
comment with that.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-05-15 13:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-15 12:47 [PATCH 1/2] rbtree_latch: quit searching when reaching to maximum depth Lai Jiangshan
2020-05-15 12:47 ` [PATCH 2/2] rbtree_latch: don't need to check seq when it found a node Lai Jiangshan
2020-05-15 13:04   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-15 13:00 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2020-05-15 14:39   ` [PATCH 1/2] rbtree_latch: quit searching when reaching to maximum depth Lai Jiangshan
2020-05-15 15:01     ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-15 15:59       ` [PATCH V2 " Lai Jiangshan
2020-05-15 15:59         ` [PATCH V2 2/2] rbtree_latch: don't need to check seq when it found a node Lai Jiangshan
2020-05-16  4:27           ` Michel Lespinasse
2020-05-16  4:52             ` Lai Jiangshan
2020-05-16  5:03               ` Michel Lespinasse
2020-05-23  0:56         ` [PATCH V2 1/2] rbtree_latch: quit searching when reaching to maximum depth Lai Jiangshan
2020-05-15 13:14 ` [PATCH " Mathieu Desnoyers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200515130030.GV2957@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=David.Woodhouse@intel.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=laijs@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=walken@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).