linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
To: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org, groug@kaod.org,
	mpe@ellerman.id.au, sukadev@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: relax check on H_SVM_INIT_ABORT
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 23:08:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200521060858.GA5278@oc0525413822.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200520174308.77820-1-ldufour@linux.ibm.com>

On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 07:43:08PM +0200, Laurent Dufour wrote:
> The commit 8c47b6ff29e3 ("KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Check caller of H_SVM_*
> Hcalls") added checks of secure bit of SRR1 to filter out the Hcall
> reserved to the Ultravisor.
> 
> However, the Hcall H_SVM_INIT_ABORT is made by the Ultravisor passing the
> context of the VM calling UV_ESM. This allows the Hypervisor to return to
> the guest without going through the Ultravisor. Thus the Secure bit of SRR1
> is not set in that particular case.
> 
> In the case a regular VM is calling H_SVM_INIT_ABORT, this hcall will be
> filtered out in kvmppc_h_svm_init_abort() because kvm->arch.secure_guest is
> not set in that case.
> 
> Fixes: 8c47b6ff29e3 ("KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Check caller of H_SVM_* Hcalls")
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com>


Reviewed-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>

> ---
>  arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c | 9 ++++++---
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> index 93493f0cbfe8..6ad1a3b14300 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> @@ -1099,9 +1099,12 @@ int kvmppc_pseries_do_hcall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  			ret = kvmppc_h_svm_init_done(vcpu->kvm);
>  		break;
>  	case H_SVM_INIT_ABORT:
> -		ret = H_UNSUPPORTED;
> -		if (kvmppc_get_srr1(vcpu) & MSR_S)
> -			ret = kvmppc_h_svm_init_abort(vcpu->kvm);
> +		/*
> +		 * Even if that call is made by the Ultravisor, the SSR1 value
> +		 * is the guest context one, with the secure bit clear as it has
> +		 * not yet been secured. So we can't check it here.
> +		 */

Frankly speaking, the comment above when read in isolation; i.e without
the delete code above, feels out of place.  The reasoning for change is
anyway captured in the changelog.  So, I think, we should delete this
comment.

Also the comment above assumes the Ultravisor will call H_SVM_INIT_ABORT
with SRR1(S) bit not set; which may or may not be true.  Regardless of
who and how H_SVM_INIT_ABORT is called, we should just call
kvmppc_h_svm_init_abort() and let it deal with the complexities.


RP

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-05-21  6:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-20 16:51 [PATCH] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: relax check on H_SVM_INIT_ABORT Laurent Dufour
2020-05-20 17:32 ` Greg Kurz
2020-05-20 17:35   ` Laurent Dufour
2020-05-20 17:43   ` [PATCH v2] " Laurent Dufour
2020-05-20 18:23     ` Greg Kurz
2020-05-21  6:08     ` Ram Pai [this message]
2020-05-27  4:16     ` Paul Mackerras
2020-05-27  9:23       ` Laurent Dufour

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200521060858.GA5278@oc0525413822.ibm.com \
    --to=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=groug@kaod.org \
    --cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ldufour@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=sukadev@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).