[PATCH v2 2/2] perf tools: ARM SPE code cleanup

[Wei Li <liwei391@huawei.com>]

- Firstly, the function auxtrace_record__init() will be invoked only
  once, the variable "arm_spe_pmus" will not be used afterwards, thus
  we don't need to check "arm_spe_pmus" is NULL or not;
- Another reason is, even though SPE is micro-architecture dependent,
  but so far it only supports "statistical-profiling-extension-v1" and
  we have no chance to use multiple SPE's PMU events in Perf command.

So remove the useless check code to make it clear.

Signed-off-by: Wei Li <liwei391@huawei.com>
---
 tools/perf/arch/arm/util/auxtrace.c | 9 ++++-----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/auxtrace.c b/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/auxtrace.c
index 28a5d0c18b1d..b187bddbd01a 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/auxtrace.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/auxtrace.c
@@ -57,17 +57,15 @@ struct auxtrace_record
 	struct evsel *evsel;
 	bool found_etm = false;
 	struct perf_pmu *found_spe = NULL;
-	static struct perf_pmu **arm_spe_pmus = NULL;
-	static int nr_spes = 0;
+	struct perf_pmu **arm_spe_pmus = NULL;
+	int nr_spes = 0;
 	int i = 0;
 
 	if (!evlist)
 		return NULL;
 
 	cs_etm_pmu = perf_pmu__find(CORESIGHT_ETM_PMU_NAME);
-
-	if (!arm_spe_pmus)
-		arm_spe_pmus = find_all_arm_spe_pmus(&nr_spes, err);
+	arm_spe_pmus = find_all_arm_spe_pmus(&nr_spes, err);
 
 	evlist__for_each_entry(evlist, evsel) {
 		if (cs_etm_pmu &&
@@ -84,6 +82,7 @@ struct auxtrace_record
 			}
 		}
 	}
+	free(arm_spe_pmus);
 
 	if (found_etm && found_spe) {
 		pr_err("Concurrent ARM Coresight ETM and SPE operation not currently supported\n");
-- 
2.17.1