linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@canonical.com>,
	Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>,
	Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] selftests/seccomp: Refactor change_syscall()
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 13:32:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202009141321.366935EF52@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87wo0wpnah.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>

On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 10:15:18PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> writes:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This refactors the seccomp selftest macros used in change_syscall(),
> > in an effort to remove special cases for mips, arm, arm64, and xtensa,
> > which paves the way for powerpc fixes.
> >
> > I'm not entirely done testing, but all-arch build tests and x86_64
> > selftests pass. I'll be doing arm, arm64, and i386 selftests shortly,
> > but I currently don't have an easy way to check xtensa, mips, nor
> > powerpc. Any help there would be appreciated!
> 
> The series builds fine for me, and all the tests pass (see below).
> 
> Thanks for picking up those changes to deal with powerpc being oddball.
> 
> Tested-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> (powerpc)

Awesome; thanks!

However...

> 
> cheers
> 
> 
> ./seccomp_bpf
> TAP version 13
> 1..86
> # Starting 86 tests from 7 test cases.
> #  RUN           global.kcmp ...
> #            OK  global.kcmp
> ok 1 global.kcmp
> [...]
> #  RUN           global.KILL_thread ...
> TAP version 13
> 1..86
> # Starting 86 tests from 7 test cases.

Was this a mis-paste, or has something very very bad happened here in
global.KILL_one_arg_six finishes?

> #  RUN           global.kcmp ...
> #            OK  global.kcmp
> ok 1 global.kcmp
> [...]
> #  RUN           global.user_notification_basic ...
> TAP version 13
> 1..86
> # Starting 86 tests from 7 test cases.
> [...]
> #  RUN           global.user_notification_basic ...
> TAP version 13
> 1..86
> # Starting 86 tests from 7 test cases.
> [...]
> #  RUN           global.user_notification_signal ...
> TAP version 13
> 1..86
> # Starting 86 tests from 7 test cases.
> [...]
> #  RUN           global.user_notification_closed_listener ...
> TAP version 13
> 1..86
> # Starting 86 tests from 7 test cases.
> [...]
> #  RUN           global.user_notification_child_pid_ns ...
> TAP version 13
> 1..86
> # Starting 86 tests from 7 test cases.
> [...]
> #  RUN           global.user_notification_sibling_pid_ns ...
> TAP version 13
> 1..86
> # Starting 86 tests from 7 test cases.
> [...]
> #  RUN           global.user_notification_sibling_pid_ns ...
> TAP version 13
> 1..86
> # Starting 86 tests from 7 test cases.
> [...]
> #  RUN           global.user_notification_sibling_pid_ns ...
> TAP version 13
> 1..86
> # Starting 86 tests from 7 test cases.
> [...]
> #  RUN           global.user_notification_fault_recv ...
> TAP version 13
> 1..86
> # Starting 86 tests from 7 test cases.
> [...]
> #  RUN           global.user_notification_continue ...
> TAP version 13
> 1..86
> # Starting 86 tests from 7 test cases.
> [...]
> #  RUN           global.user_notification_filter_empty ...
> TAP version 13
> 1..86
> # Starting 86 tests from 7 test cases.
> [...]
> #  RUN           global.user_notification_filter_empty_threaded ...
> TAP version 13
> 1..86
> # Starting 86 tests from 7 test cases.
> [...]
> #  RUN           global.user_notification_addfd ...
> TAP version 13
> 1..86
> # Starting 86 tests from 7 test cases.
> [...]
> #  RUN           global.user_notification_addfd_rlimit ...
> TAP version 13
> 1..86
> # Starting 86 tests from 7 test cases.
> [...]
> # PASSED: 86 / 86 tests passed.
> # Totals: pass:86 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0

And after every user_notification test? O_O

-- 
Kees Cook

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-14 20:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-12 11:08 [PATCH 00/15] selftests/seccomp: Refactor change_syscall() Kees Cook
2020-09-12 11:08 ` [PATCH 01/15] selftests/seccomp: Refactor arch register macros to avoid xtensa special case Kees Cook
2020-09-15 15:51   ` Christian Brauner
2020-09-12 11:08 ` [PATCH 02/15] selftests/seccomp: Provide generic syscall setting macro Kees Cook
2020-09-15 15:53   ` Christian Brauner
2020-09-12 11:08 ` [PATCH 03/15] selftests/seccomp: mips: Define SYSCALL_NUM_SET macro Kees Cook
2020-09-15 15:55   ` Christian Brauner
2020-09-18 22:00     ` Kees Cook
2020-09-12 11:08 ` [PATCH 04/15] selftests/seccomp: arm: " Kees Cook
2020-09-15 15:56   ` Christian Brauner
2020-09-12 11:08 ` [PATCH 05/15] selftests/seccomp: arm64: " Kees Cook
2020-09-15 15:58   ` Christian Brauner
2020-09-12 11:08 ` [PATCH 06/15] selftests/seccomp: mips: Remove O32-specific macro Kees Cook
2020-09-15 16:00   ` Christian Brauner
2020-09-12 11:08 ` [PATCH 07/15] selftests/seccomp: Remove syscall setting #ifdefs Kees Cook
2020-09-15 16:01   ` Christian Brauner
2020-09-12 11:08 ` [PATCH 08/15] selftests/seccomp: Convert HAVE_GETREG into ARCH_GETREG/ARCH_SETREG Kees Cook
2020-09-15 16:03   ` Christian Brauner
2020-09-12 11:08 ` [PATCH 09/15] selftests/seccomp: Convert REGSET calls " Kees Cook
2020-09-15 16:05   ` Christian Brauner
2020-09-12 11:08 ` [PATCH 10/15] selftests/seccomp: Avoid redundant register flushes Kees Cook
2020-09-15 16:08   ` Christian Brauner
2020-09-12 11:08 ` [PATCH 11/15] selftests/seccomp: Remove SYSCALL_NUM_RET_SHARE_REG in favor of SYSCALL_RET_SET Kees Cook
2020-09-15 16:11   ` Christian Brauner
2020-09-12 11:08 ` [PATCH 12/15] selftests/seccomp: powerpc: Fix seccomp return value testing Kees Cook
2020-09-14  3:38   ` Michael Ellerman
2020-09-12 11:08 ` [PATCH 13/15] selftests/seccomp: powerpc: Set syscall return during ptrace syscall exit Kees Cook
2020-09-14  5:47   ` Michael Ellerman
2020-09-14 20:20     ` Kees Cook
2020-09-12 11:08 ` [PATCH 14/15] selftests/clone3: Avoid OS-defined clone_args Kees Cook
2020-09-15 16:25   ` Christian Brauner
2020-09-18 22:00     ` Kees Cook
2020-09-12 11:08 ` [PATCH 15/15] selftests/seccomp: Use __NR_mknodat instead of __NR_mknod Kees Cook
2020-09-15 16:16   ` Christian Brauner
2020-09-14 12:15 ` [PATCH 00/15] selftests/seccomp: Refactor change_syscall() Michael Ellerman
2020-09-14 20:32   ` Kees Cook [this message]
2020-09-15 11:12     ` Max Filippov
2020-09-15 12:52     ` Michael Ellerman
2020-09-15  8:45 ` Max Filippov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202009141321.366935EF52@keescook \
    --to=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=cascardo@canonical.com \
    --cc=christian@brauner.io \
    --cc=jcmvbkbc@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=wad@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).