linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] perf parse-event: Fix cpu map leaks
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 09:18:14 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200915121814.GE720847@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200915031819.386559-5-namhyung@kernel.org>

Em Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 12:18:12PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> Like evlist cpu map, evsel's cpu map should have proper refcount by
> releasing the original count after creation.

"releasing original count after creation"?

There are two fixes here, one its legit, i.e. when failing to create
the new evsel, if you created the perf_cpu_map, drop the refcount,
which, in this case, will free it since perf_cpu_map__new() sets it to
1.

But what about the other? Humm, I see, since a new refcount is being
obtained, then we need to drop the first.

This all got complicated, perhaps the following patch is simpler?

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
index c4d2394e2b2dc60f..3dceeacf8669bc5d 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
@@ -353,18 +353,20 @@ __add_event(struct list_head *list, int *idx,
 	    const char *cpu_list)
 {
 	struct evsel *evsel;
-	struct perf_cpu_map *cpus = pmu ? pmu->cpus :
+	struct perf_cpu_map *cpus = pmu ? perf_cpu_map__get(pmu->cpus) :
 			       cpu_list ? perf_cpu_map__new(cpu_list) : NULL;
 
 	if (init_attr)
 		event_attr_init(attr);
 
 	evsel = evsel__new_idx(attr, *idx);
-	if (!evsel)
+	if (!evsel) {
+		perf_cpu_map__put(cpus);
 		return NULL;
+	}
 
 	(*idx)++;
-	evsel->core.cpus   = perf_cpu_map__get(cpus);
+	evsel->core.cpus     = cpus;
 	evsel->core.own_cpus = perf_cpu_map__get(cpus);
 	evsel->core.system_wide = pmu ? pmu->is_uncore : false;
 	evsel->auto_merge_stats = auto_merge_stats;
 

---

I.e. if we're going to share pmu->cpus, grab the necessary refcount at
that point, if we're going to create one (pmu == NULL), then
perf_cpu_map__new() will have the refcount we need (will set it to 1).

Then, if we fail to create the new evsel, we just drop the refcount we
got either from perf_cpu_map__get(pmu->cpus) or from
perf_cpu_map__new(cpu_list) (NULL is ok for __put() operations, that
covers that last ': NULL').

And then, when we go make evsel->core.cpus share that cpu_map, we know
we have the necessary refcount already, right?

No need to later on drop the one obtained previously via:

  evsel->core.cpus   = perf_cpu_map__get(cpus);

And we don't need to drop it later when we want to drop the extra
refcount it gets when pmu == NULL.

- Arnaldo

> This fixes the following ASAN report:
> 
>   Direct leak of 840 byte(s) in 70 object(s) allocated from:
>     #0 0x7fe36703f628 in malloc (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.5+0x107628)
>     #1 0x559fbbf611ca in cpu_map__trim_new /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/lib/perf/cpumap.c:79
>     #2 0x559fbbf6229c in perf_cpu_map__new /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/lib/perf/cpumap.c:237
>     #3 0x559fbbcc6c6d in __add_event util/parse-events.c:357
>     #4 0x559fbbcc6c6d in add_event_tool util/parse-events.c:408
>     #5 0x559fbbcc6c6d in parse_events_add_tool util/parse-events.c:1414
>     #6 0x559fbbd8474d in parse_events_parse util/parse-events.y:439
>     #7 0x559fbbcc95da in parse_events__scanner util/parse-events.c:2096
>     #8 0x559fbbcc95da in __parse_events util/parse-events.c:2141
>     #9 0x559fbbc2788b in check_parse_id tests/pmu-events.c:406
>     #10 0x559fbbc2788b in check_parse_id tests/pmu-events.c:393
>     #11 0x559fbbc2788b in check_parse_fake tests/pmu-events.c:436
>     #12 0x559fbbc2788b in metric_parse_fake tests/pmu-events.c:553
>     #13 0x559fbbc27e2d in test_parsing_fake tests/pmu-events.c:599
>     #14 0x559fbbc27e2d in test_parsing_fake tests/pmu-events.c:574
>     #15 0x559fbbc0109b in run_test tests/builtin-test.c:410
>     #16 0x559fbbc0109b in test_and_print tests/builtin-test.c:440
>     #17 0x559fbbc03e69 in __cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:695
>     #18 0x559fbbc03e69 in cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:807
>     #19 0x559fbbc691f4 in run_builtin /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:312
>     #20 0x559fbbb071a8 in handle_internal_command /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:364
>     #21 0x559fbbb071a8 in run_argv /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:408
>     #22 0x559fbbb071a8 in main /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:538
>     #23 0x7fe366b68cc9 in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:308
> 
> And I've failed which commit introduced this bug as the code was
> heavily changed since then. ;-/
> 
> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> ---
>  tools/perf/util/parse-events.c | 7 ++++++-
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
> index c4d2394e2b2d..b35e4bb1cecb 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
> @@ -360,8 +360,11 @@ __add_event(struct list_head *list, int *idx,
>  		event_attr_init(attr);
>  
>  	evsel = evsel__new_idx(attr, *idx);
> -	if (!evsel)
> +	if (!evsel) {
> +		if (!pmu)
> +			perf_cpu_map__put(cpus);
>  		return NULL;
> +	}
>  
>  	(*idx)++;
>  	evsel->core.cpus   = perf_cpu_map__get(cpus);
> @@ -369,6 +372,8 @@ __add_event(struct list_head *list, int *idx,
>  	evsel->core.system_wide = pmu ? pmu->is_uncore : false;
>  	evsel->auto_merge_stats = auto_merge_stats;
>  
> +	if (!pmu)
> +		perf_cpu_map__put(cpus);
>  	if (name)
>  		evsel->name = strdup(name);
>  
> -- 
> 2.28.0.618.gf4bc123cb7-goog
> 

-- 

- Arnaldo

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-15 12:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-15  3:18 [PATCHSET v2 00/11] perf tools: Fix various memory leaks Namhyung Kim
2020-09-15  3:18 ` [PATCH 01/11] perf metric: Fix some " Namhyung Kim
2020-09-15 11:58   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-09-15  3:18 ` [PATCH 02/11] perf metric: Fix some memory leaks - part 2 Namhyung Kim
2020-09-15 11:59   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-09-15  3:18 ` [PATCH 03/11] perf evlist: Fix cpu/thread map leak Namhyung Kim
2020-09-15  3:18 ` [PATCH 04/11] perf parse-event: Fix cpu map leaks Namhyung Kim
2020-09-15 12:18   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2020-09-15 14:39     ` Namhyung Kim
2020-09-15 16:51       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-09-15  3:18 ` [PATCH 05/11] perf parse-event: Fix memory leak in evsel->unit Namhyung Kim
2020-09-15 12:19   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-09-15 18:59     ` Ian Rogers
2020-09-15 19:56       ` David Malcolm
2020-09-16  7:12         ` Namhyung Kim
2020-09-16 18:37           ` Ian Rogers
2020-09-15 20:03       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-09-15  3:18 ` [PATCH 06/11] perf test: Fix memory leaks in parse-metric test Namhyung Kim
2020-09-15 12:23   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-09-15  3:18 ` [PATCH 07/11] perf metric: Release expr_parse_ctx after testing Namhyung Kim
2020-09-15  3:18 ` [PATCH 08/11] perf metric: Free metric when it failed to resolve Namhyung Kim
2020-09-15 12:24   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-09-15  3:18 ` [PATCH 09/11] perf metric: Do not free metric when " Namhyung Kim
2020-09-15  3:18 ` [PATCH 10/11] perf test: Free aliases for PMU event map aliases test Namhyung Kim
2020-09-15  7:37   ` John Garry
2020-09-15 11:57     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-09-15  3:18 ` [PATCH 11/11] perf test: Free formats for perf pmu parse test Namhyung Kim
2020-09-15  5:15 ` [PATCHSET v2 00/11] perf tools: Fix various memory leaks Ian Rogers
2020-09-15 14:49   ` Namhyung Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200915121814.GE720847@kernel.org \
    --to=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).