From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Ross Philipson <ross.philipson@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
dpsmith@apertussolutions.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, hpa@zytor.com,
luto@amacapital.net, trenchboot-devel@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/13] x86: Add early TPM1.2/TPM2.0 interface support for Secure Launch
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 08:43:13 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200925054313.GB165011@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1600959521-24158-6-git-send-email-ross.philipson@oracle.com>
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 10:58:33AM -0400, Ross Philipson wrote:
> From: "Daniel P. Smith" <dpsmith@apertussolutions.com>
>
> This commit introduces an abstraction for TPM1.2 and TPM2.0 devices
> above the TPM hardware interface.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Smith <dpsmith@apertussolutions.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ross Philipson <ross.philipson@oracle.com>
This is way, way too PoC. I wonder why there is no RFC tag.
Please also read section 2 of
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.8/process/submitting-patches.html
You should leverage existing TPM code in a way or another. Refine it so
that it scales for your purpose and then compile it into your thing
(just include the necesary C-files with relative paths).
How it is now is never going to fly.
/Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-25 5:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-24 14:58 [PATCH 00/13] x86: Trenchboot secure dynamic launch Linux kernel support Ross Philipson
2020-09-24 14:58 ` [PATCH 01/13] x86: Secure Launch Kconfig Ross Philipson
2020-09-25 2:08 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-09-25 14:59 ` Ross Philipson
2020-09-24 14:58 ` [PATCH 02/13] x86: Secure Launch main header file Ross Philipson
2020-09-24 14:58 ` [PATCH 03/13] x86: Add early SHA support for Secure Launch early measurements Ross Philipson
2020-09-29 17:26 ` Jason Andryuk
2020-09-24 14:58 ` [PATCH 04/13] x86: Add early TPM TIS/CRB interface support for Secure Launch Ross Philipson
2020-09-24 14:58 ` [PATCH 05/13] x86: Add early TPM1.2/TPM2.0 " Ross Philipson
2020-09-25 5:43 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2020-09-29 23:47 ` Daniel P. Smith
2020-09-30 3:19 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-09-30 3:24 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-20 0:33 ` Daniel P. Smith
2020-09-24 14:58 ` [PATCH 06/13] x86: Add early general TPM " Ross Philipson
2020-09-24 14:58 ` [PATCH 07/13] x86: Secure Launch kernel early boot stub Ross Philipson
2020-09-24 17:38 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-09-25 14:56 ` Ross Philipson
2020-09-25 19:18 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-09-29 14:03 ` Ross Philipson
2020-09-29 14:53 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-10-15 18:26 ` Daniel Kiper
2020-10-16 20:51 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-10-19 14:38 ` Ross Philipson
2020-10-19 17:06 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-10-19 19:00 ` Ross Philipson
2020-10-19 14:51 ` Daniel Kiper
2020-10-19 17:18 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-10-21 15:28 ` Daniel Kiper
2020-10-21 16:18 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-10-21 20:36 ` Ross Philipson
2020-09-24 14:58 ` [PATCH 08/13] x86: Secure Launch kernel late " Ross Philipson
2020-09-24 14:58 ` [PATCH 09/13] x86: Secure Launch SMP bringup support Ross Philipson
2020-09-24 14:58 ` [PATCH 10/13] x86: Secure Launch adding event log securityfs Ross Philipson
2020-09-24 14:58 ` [PATCH 11/13] kexec: Secure Launch kexec SEXIT support Ross Philipson
2020-09-24 14:58 ` [PATCH 12/13] reboot: Secure Launch SEXIT support on reboot paths Ross Philipson
2020-09-24 14:58 ` [PATCH 13/13] tpm: Allow locality 2 to be set when initializing the TPM for Secure Launch Ross Philipson
2020-09-25 5:30 ` [PATCH 00/13] x86: Trenchboot secure dynamic launch Linux kernel support Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-09-25 21:32 ` Daniel P. Smith
2020-09-27 23:59 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200925054313.GB165011@linux.intel.com \
--to=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dpsmith@apertussolutions.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=ross.philipson@oracle.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=trenchboot-devel@googlegroups.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).