From: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux USB List <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
Ravi Chandra Sadineni <ravisadineni@chromium.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, Peter Chen <peter.chen@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: usb: Add binding for discrete onboard USB hubs
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 15:19:17 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200930191917.GA221711@rowland.harvard.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAD=FV=WcDzgcHNn1+gH+gq_WEwpD0XXdJGm2fBVpAB=3fVbzZA@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 08:28:17AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > The 2nd issue is where do extra properties for a device go. That's
> > nothing new nor special to USB. They go with the device node. We
> > already went thru that with the last attempt.
> >
> > So for this case, we'd have something like this:
> >
> > usb_controller {
> > dr_mode = "host";
> > #address-cells = <1>;
> > #size-cells = <0>;
> >
> > hub@1 {
> > compatible = "usbbda,5411";
> > reg = <1>;
> > vdd-supply = <&pp3300_hub>;
> > };
> > };
> >
> > This is no different than needing a reset line deasserted as the prior
> > attempt did.
>
> I'd believe that the above could be made to work with enough software
> change in the USB stack. Presumably we wouldn't want to actually do a
> full probe of the device until USB actually enumerated it, but I guess
> you could add some type of optional "pre-probe" step where a driver is
> called? So you'd call a pre-probe on whatever driver implements
> "usbbda,5411" and it would turn on the power supply. ...then, if the
> device is actually there, the normal probe would be called? I guess
> that'd work...
Would a better approach be to move the code into the xhci-platform
driver, rather than adding a new artificial platform device as
Matthias's patch does? That's the way other platform-specific DT
issues have generally been handled in the USB stack.
> One thing that strikes me as a possible problem, though, is that I
> totally envision HW guys coming back and saying: "oh, we want to
> second source that USB hub and randomly stuff a different hub on some
> boards". In theory that's a reasonable suggestion, right? USB is a
> probable bus. We turn on power to the USB hub (and the regulator to
> turn on power is the same no matter which hub is stuffed) and then we
> can just check which device got enumerated. It's likely that both
> hubs would behave the same from a software point of view, but they
> would have different VID/PID.
>
> As far as I understand the current USB bindings account for the fact
> that the device(s) specified in the device tree might or might not be
> there. Adding a node under the controller like you show above means:
> "if something is plugged into port 1 of this USB hub and if that thing
> matches 0x0bda/0x5411 then here are the extra properties (vdd-supply)
> for it". With your proposal I believe we're changing it to mean
> "there will definitely be a device plugged into port 1 of this USB hub
> and it will match 0x0bda/0x5411." Unless I'm mistaken, that will have
> potential impacts on the ability to second source things. I guess
> both pre-probe functions could be called and (since there can be
> multiple users of a regulator) it'd be OK, but if we get into reset
> lines it's not much fun. However, describing the device more like
> Matthias has done it will be nicely compatible with second sourcing.
Can the matching be done purely by port number under the controller's root
hub without regard to the VID/PID?
Alan Stern
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-30 19:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-28 17:13 [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: usb: Add binding for discrete onboard USB hubs Matthias Kaehlcke
2020-09-28 17:13 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] USB: misc: Add onboard_usb_hub driver Matthias Kaehlcke
2020-09-28 18:47 ` Alan Stern
2020-09-29 1:43 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2020-09-29 16:00 ` Alan Stern
2020-09-29 16:50 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2020-09-28 22:03 ` Doug Anderson
2020-09-29 1:59 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2020-09-28 22:13 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: usb: Add binding for discrete onboard USB hubs Doug Anderson
2020-09-29 2:14 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2020-09-29 20:17 ` Rob Herring
2020-09-29 22:09 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2020-09-30 1:32 ` Alan Stern
2020-09-30 12:49 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2020-09-30 14:44 ` Rob Herring
2020-09-30 15:28 ` Doug Anderson
2020-09-30 18:00 ` Doug Anderson
2020-09-30 19:19 ` Rob Herring
2020-10-01 21:39 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2020-09-30 19:19 ` Alan Stern [this message]
2020-09-30 20:20 ` Rob Herring
2020-10-01 1:24 ` Alan Stern
2020-10-01 21:54 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2020-10-02 1:21 ` Alan Stern
2020-10-02 16:08 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2020-10-02 18:48 ` Alan Stern
2020-10-02 17:08 ` Doug Anderson
2020-10-02 18:36 ` Alan Stern
2020-10-02 22:58 ` Rob Herring
2020-10-03 12:41 ` Alan Stern
2020-10-05 16:06 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2020-10-05 16:15 ` Alan Stern
2020-10-05 19:18 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2020-10-05 19:36 ` Alan Stern
2020-10-05 19:59 ` Rob Herring
2020-10-05 23:29 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2020-10-05 19:36 ` Rob Herring
2020-10-05 19:20 ` Rob Herring
2020-10-02 22:28 ` Rob Herring
2020-10-02 23:09 ` Doug Anderson
2020-10-06 0:45 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2020-10-06 14:18 ` Alan Stern
2020-10-06 16:59 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2020-10-06 17:15 ` Alan Stern
2020-10-06 19:25 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2020-10-07 1:00 ` Alan Stern
2020-10-07 16:03 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2020-10-07 16:38 ` Alan Stern
2020-10-07 17:28 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2020-10-07 19:25 ` Alan Stern
2020-10-07 19:42 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2020-10-07 20:17 ` Alan Stern
2020-10-07 21:42 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2020-10-08 14:09 ` Alan Stern
2020-10-09 23:13 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200930191917.GA221711@rowland.harvard.edu \
--to=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hadess@hadess.net \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mka@chromium.org \
--cc=peter.chen@nxp.com \
--cc=ravisadineni@chromium.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).