From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Nitesh Narayan Lal <nitesh@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] nohz: only wakeup a single target cpu when kicking a task
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2020 10:59:40 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201008145940.GG6026@xz-x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201007180229.724302019@redhat.com>
On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 03:01:52PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> +static void tick_nohz_kick_task(struct task_struct *tsk)
> +{
> + int cpu = task_cpu(tsk);
> +
> + /*
> + * If the task concurrently migrates to another cpu,
> + * we guarantee it sees the new tick dependency upon
> + * schedule.
> + *
> + *
> + * set_task_cpu(p, cpu);
> + * STORE p->cpu = @cpu
> + * __schedule() (switch to task 'p')
> + * LOCK rq->lock
> + * smp_mb__after_spin_lock() STORE p->tick_dep_mask
> + * tick_nohz_task_switch() smp_mb() (atomic_fetch_or())
> + * LOAD p->tick_dep_mask LOAD p->cpu
> + */
> +
> + preempt_disable();
Pure question: is preempt_disable() required here? Same question to
tick_nohz_full_kick_all().
> + if (cpu_online(cpu))
> + tick_nohz_full_kick_cpu(cpu);
> + preempt_enable();
> +}
--
Peter Xu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-08 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-07 18:01 [patch 0/2] nohz_full: only wakeup target CPUs when notifying new tick dependency (v2) Marcelo Tosatti
2020-10-07 18:01 ` [patch 1/2] nohz: only wakeup a single target cpu when kicking a task Marcelo Tosatti
2020-10-08 12:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-08 17:54 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2020-10-08 19:54 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-10-13 17:13 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2020-10-14 8:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-14 23:40 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-10-15 10:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-26 14:42 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-10-20 18:52 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2020-10-22 12:53 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-10-08 14:59 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2020-10-08 15:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-08 19:16 ` Peter Xu
2020-10-08 19:48 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-10-08 17:43 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2020-10-07 18:01 ` [patch 2/2] nohz: change signal tick dependency to wakeup CPUs of member tasks Marcelo Tosatti
2020-10-08 12:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-08 18:04 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2020-10-08 19:11 [patch 0/2] nohz_full: only wakeup target CPUs when notifying new tick dependency (v3) Marcelo Tosatti
2020-10-08 19:11 ` [patch 1/2] nohz: only wakeup a single target cpu when kicking a task Marcelo Tosatti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201008145940.GG6026@xz-x1 \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=nitesh@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).