From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 199BCC4741F for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 15:21:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2DA820756 for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 15:21:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="EZnQAva8" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727116AbgJ3PVb (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Oct 2020 11:21:31 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42806 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726674AbgJ3PVb (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Oct 2020 11:21:31 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:8b0:10b:1236::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD690C0613CF for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 08:21:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:References: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:In-Reply-To; bh=CRw6w4veM1X9Ep5BMbCHybw29MJr1QwWDKX1hJOZy3c=; b=EZnQAva8wHPOtQW6NlmsWUlaYN oOR1mD7azg4xiDhi8TNy9WAYWO1Q4dfVcGXdar4Rt4TevYnVPuCW6OsnRaSOM7oRCJUFvlckAHOnh gphkPwwWas2wf/C/qrJgIreRo2aKFmHLc+BDzoNVZcawLSEtl6EK+t3MoqLfRASb8xUBe7Mxm89r0 0+coqQaVWqucFFo+INK2tVSBuPy0bKPG+t2hyxbenGWhh7wCJxCfyZVJF4Ehm5oZhbFfIg3NGBdp1 AF/bW1fh1MbTXkExW6aUhktEDDtzIyu/QcVGkz9rSwwGhgmkQsPzKq/WIxyuSxxRDUQuBhQbFo1vT hbuFUWMw==; Received: from j217100.upc-j.chello.nl ([24.132.217.100] helo=noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net) by casper.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kYWDJ-0002kW-NB; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 15:21:14 +0000 Received: from hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net [192.168.1.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82261307943; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 16:21:12 +0100 (CET) Received: by hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 0) id 001292B708597; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 16:21:11 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <20201030151955.258178461@infradead.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 16:13:50 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: mingo@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kan.liang@linux.intel.com, acme@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@redhat.com, namhyung@kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com, eranian@google.com, peterz@infradead.org Subject: [PATCH 5/6] perf/arch: Remove perf_sample_data::regs_user_copy References: <20201030151345.540479897@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org struct perf_sample_data lives on-stack, we should be careful about it's size. Furthermore, the pt_regs copy in there is only because x86_64 is a trainwreck, solve it differently. Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Tested-by: Steven Rostedt --- arch/arm/kernel/perf_regs.c | 3 +-- arch/arm64/kernel/perf_regs.c | 3 +-- arch/csky/kernel/perf_regs.c | 3 +-- arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c | 3 +-- arch/riscv/kernel/perf_regs.c | 3 +-- arch/s390/kernel/perf_regs.c | 3 +-- arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c | 15 +++++++++++---- include/linux/perf_event.h | 6 ------ include/linux/perf_regs.h | 6 ++---- kernel/events/core.c | 8 +++----- 10 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) --- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_regs.c +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_regs.c @@ -32,8 +32,7 @@ u64 perf_reg_abi(struct task_struct *tas } void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user, - struct pt_regs *regs, - struct pt_regs *regs_user_copy) + struct pt_regs *regs) { regs_user->regs = task_pt_regs(current); regs_user->abi = perf_reg_abi(current); --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_regs.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_regs.c @@ -73,8 +73,7 @@ u64 perf_reg_abi(struct task_struct *tas } void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user, - struct pt_regs *regs, - struct pt_regs *regs_user_copy) + struct pt_regs *regs) { regs_user->regs = task_pt_regs(current); regs_user->abi = perf_reg_abi(current); --- a/arch/csky/kernel/perf_regs.c +++ b/arch/csky/kernel/perf_regs.c @@ -32,8 +32,7 @@ u64 perf_reg_abi(struct task_struct *tas } void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user, - struct pt_regs *regs, - struct pt_regs *regs_user_copy) + struct pt_regs *regs) { regs_user->regs = task_pt_regs(current); regs_user->abi = perf_reg_abi(current); --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c @@ -144,8 +144,7 @@ u64 perf_reg_abi(struct task_struct *tas } void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user, - struct pt_regs *regs, - struct pt_regs *regs_user_copy) + struct pt_regs *regs) { regs_user->regs = task_pt_regs(current); regs_user->abi = (regs_user->regs) ? perf_reg_abi(current) : --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/perf_regs.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/perf_regs.c @@ -36,8 +36,7 @@ u64 perf_reg_abi(struct task_struct *tas } void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user, - struct pt_regs *regs, - struct pt_regs *regs_user_copy) + struct pt_regs *regs) { regs_user->regs = task_pt_regs(current); regs_user->abi = perf_reg_abi(current); --- a/arch/s390/kernel/perf_regs.c +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/perf_regs.c @@ -53,8 +53,7 @@ u64 perf_reg_abi(struct task_struct *tas } void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user, - struct pt_regs *regs, - struct pt_regs *regs_user_copy) + struct pt_regs *regs) { /* * Use the regs from the first interruption and let --- a/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c @@ -101,8 +101,7 @@ u64 perf_reg_abi(struct task_struct *tas } void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user, - struct pt_regs *regs, - struct pt_regs *regs_user_copy) + struct pt_regs *regs) { regs_user->regs = task_pt_regs(current); regs_user->abi = perf_reg_abi(current); @@ -129,12 +128,20 @@ u64 perf_reg_abi(struct task_struct *tas return PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_64; } +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct pt_regs, nmi_user_regs); + void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user, - struct pt_regs *regs, - struct pt_regs *regs_user_copy) + struct pt_regs *regs) { + struct pt_regs *regs_user_copy = this_cpu_ptr(&nmi_user_regs); struct pt_regs *user_regs = task_pt_regs(current); + if (!in_nmi()) { + regs_user->regs = user_regs; + regs_user->abi = perf_reg_abi(current); + return; + } + /* * If we're in an NMI that interrupted task_pt_regs setup, then * we can't sample user regs at all. This check isn't really --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h @@ -1022,13 +1022,7 @@ struct perf_sample_data { struct perf_callchain_entry *callchain; u64 aux_size; - /* - * regs_user may point to task_pt_regs or to regs_user_copy, depending - * on arch details. - */ struct perf_regs regs_user; - struct pt_regs regs_user_copy; - struct perf_regs regs_intr; u64 stack_user_size; --- a/include/linux/perf_regs.h +++ b/include/linux/perf_regs.h @@ -20,8 +20,7 @@ u64 perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int perf_reg_validate(u64 mask); u64 perf_reg_abi(struct task_struct *task); void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user, - struct pt_regs *regs, - struct pt_regs *regs_user_copy); + struct pt_regs *regs); #else #define PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK 0 @@ -42,8 +41,7 @@ static inline u64 perf_reg_abi(struct ta } static inline void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user, - struct pt_regs *regs, - struct pt_regs *regs_user_copy) + struct pt_regs *regs); { regs_user->regs = task_pt_regs(current); regs_user->abi = perf_reg_abi(current); --- a/kernel/events/core.c +++ b/kernel/events/core.c @@ -6374,14 +6374,13 @@ perf_output_sample_regs(struct perf_outp } static void perf_sample_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user, - struct pt_regs *regs, - struct pt_regs *regs_user_copy) + struct pt_regs *regs) { if (user_mode(regs)) { regs_user->abi = perf_reg_abi(current); regs_user->regs = regs; } else if (!(current->flags & PF_KTHREAD)) { - perf_get_regs_user(regs_user, regs, regs_user_copy); + perf_get_regs_user(regs_user, regs); } else { regs_user->abi = PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_NONE; regs_user->regs = NULL; @@ -7083,8 +7082,7 @@ void perf_prepare_sample(struct perf_eve } if (sample_type & (PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_USER | PERF_SAMPLE_STACK_USER)) - perf_sample_regs_user(&data->regs_user, regs, - &data->regs_user_copy); + perf_sample_regs_user(&data->regs_user, regs); if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_USER) { /* regs dump ABI info */