From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Li Aubrey <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>,
Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] sched/fair: Merge select_idle_core/cpu()
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 12:02:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210127120245.GC3592@techsingularity.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKfTPtBhq25D8iZ67n+kkf9Mdyf+OradvVC5pG0MeZEMKZmU2g@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 11:43:22AM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > @@ -6149,18 +6161,31 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int t
> > }
> >
> > for_each_cpu_wrap(cpu, cpus, target) {
> > - if (!--nr)
> > - return -1;
> > - if (available_idle_cpu(cpu) || sched_idle_cpu(cpu))
> > - break;
> > + if (smt) {
> > + i = select_idle_core(p, cpu, cpus, &idle_cpu);
> > + if ((unsigned int)i < nr_cpumask_bits)
> > + return i;
> > +
> > + } else {
> > + if (!--nr)
> > + return -1;
> > + i = __select_idle_cpu(cpu);
>
> you should use idle_cpu directly instead of this intermediate i variable
>
> + idle_cpu = __select_idle_cpu(cpu);
> + if ((unsigned int)idle_cpu < nr_cpumask_bits)
> + break;
>
> Apart ths small comment above, the patch looks good to me and I
> haven't any performance regression anymore
>
It's matching the code sequence in the SMT block. If we are going to make
that change, then go the full way with this?
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 52a650aa2108..01e40e36c386 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -6129,7 +6129,7 @@ static inline int select_idle_core(struct task_struct *p, int core, struct cpuma
static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int target)
{
struct cpumask *cpus = this_cpu_cpumask_var_ptr(select_idle_mask);
- int i, cpu, idle_cpu = -1, nr = INT_MAX;
+ int cpu, idle_cpu = -1, nr = INT_MAX;
bool smt = test_idle_cores(target, false);
int this = smp_processor_id();
struct sched_domain *this_sd;
@@ -6162,18 +6162,16 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int t
for_each_cpu_wrap(cpu, cpus, target) {
if (smt) {
- i = select_idle_core(p, cpu, cpus, &idle_cpu);
- if ((unsigned int)i < nr_cpumask_bits)
- return i;
+ idle_cpu = select_idle_core(p, cpu, cpus, &idle_cpu);
+ if ((unsigned int)idle_cpu < nr_cpumask_bits)
+ return idle_cpu;
} else {
if (!--nr)
return -1;
- i = __select_idle_cpu(cpu);
- if ((unsigned int)i < nr_cpumask_bits) {
- idle_cpu = i;
+ idle_cpu = __select_idle_cpu(cpu);
+ if ((unsigned int)idle_cpu < nr_cpumask_bits)
break;
- }
}
}
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-27 12:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-25 8:59 [PATCH v4 0/4] Scan for an idle sibling in a single pass Mel Gorman
2021-01-25 8:59 ` [PATCH 1/4] sched/fair: Remove SIS_AVG_CPU Mel Gorman
2021-01-25 8:59 ` [PATCH 2/4] sched/fair: Move avg_scan_cost calculations under SIS_PROP Mel Gorman
2021-01-27 10:39 ` Vincent Guittot
2021-01-25 8:59 ` [PATCH 3/4] sched/fair: Remove select_idle_smt() Mel Gorman
2021-01-27 10:39 ` Vincent Guittot
2021-02-17 13:17 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Mel Gorman
2021-01-25 8:59 ` [PATCH 4/4] sched/fair: Merge select_idle_core/cpu() Mel Gorman
2021-01-27 10:43 ` Vincent Guittot
2021-01-27 12:02 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2021-01-27 13:07 ` Vincent Guittot
2021-01-27 13:21 ` Mel Gorman
2021-01-27 13:26 ` Vincent Guittot
2021-01-27 13:51 [PATCH v5 0/4] Scan for an idle sibling in a single pass Mel Gorman
2021-01-27 13:52 ` [PATCH 4/4] sched/fair: Merge select_idle_core/cpu() Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210127120245.GC3592@techsingularity.net \
--to=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qais.yousef@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).