linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
To: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Cc: yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com,
	pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com, sanyog.r.kale@intel.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] soundwire: qcom: update register read/write routine
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 19:56:46 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210201142646.GD2771@vkoul-mobl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210129173248.5941-6-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>

On 29-01-21, 17:32, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> In the existing code every soundwire register read and register write
> are kinda blocked. Each of these are using a special command id that
> generates interrupt after it successfully finishes. This is really
> overhead, limiting and not really necessary unless we are doing
> something special.
> 
> We can simply read/write the fifo that should also give exactly
> what we need! This will also allow to read/write registers in
> interrupt context, which was not possible with the special

Okay but then why use a mutex ?

> command approach.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/soundwire/qcom.c | 148 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 96 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c b/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c
> index 83df15d83935..d61b204dc284 100644
> --- a/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c
> @@ -78,13 +78,15 @@
>  #define SWRM_SPECIAL_CMD_ID	0xF
>  #define MAX_FREQ_NUM		1
>  #define TIMEOUT_MS		(2 * HZ)
> -#define QCOM_SWRM_MAX_RD_LEN	0xf
> +#define QCOM_SWRM_MAX_RD_LEN	0x1
>  #define QCOM_SDW_MAX_PORTS	14
>  #define DEFAULT_CLK_FREQ	9600000
>  #define SWRM_MAX_DAIS		0xF
>  #define SWR_INVALID_PARAM 0xFF
>  #define SWR_HSTOP_MAX_VAL 0xF
>  #define SWR_HSTART_MIN_VAL 0x0
> +#define SWR_BROADCAST_CMD_ID    0x0F
> +#define MAX_FIFO_RD_FAIL_RETRY 3
>  
>  struct qcom_swrm_port_config {
>  	u8 si;
> @@ -104,11 +106,13 @@ struct qcom_swrm_ctrl {
>  	struct regmap *regmap;
>  	void __iomem *mmio;
>  	struct completion *comp;
> +	struct completion broadcast;
>  	struct work_struct slave_work;
>  	/* read/write lock */
>  	spinlock_t comp_lock;
>  	/* Port alloc/free lock */
>  	struct mutex port_lock;
> +	struct mutex io_lock;
>  	struct clk *hclk;
>  	u8 wr_cmd_id;
>  	u8 rd_cmd_id;
> @@ -122,6 +126,8 @@ struct qcom_swrm_ctrl {
>  	int rows_index;
>  	unsigned long dout_port_mask;
>  	unsigned long din_port_mask;
> +	u8 rcmd_id;
> +	u8 wcmd_id;
>  	struct qcom_swrm_port_config pconfig[QCOM_SDW_MAX_PORTS];
>  	struct sdw_stream_runtime *sruntime[SWRM_MAX_DAIS];
>  	enum sdw_slave_status status[SDW_MAX_DEVICES];
> @@ -200,75 +206,111 @@ static int qcom_swrm_cpu_reg_write(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl, int reg,
>  	return SDW_CMD_OK;
>  }
>  
> -static int qcom_swrm_cmd_fifo_wr_cmd(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl, u8 cmd_data,
> -				     u8 dev_addr, u16 reg_addr)
> +static u32 swrm_get_packed_reg_val(u8 *cmd_id, u8 cmd_data,
> +				 u8 dev_addr, u16 reg_addr)
>  {
> -	DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(comp);
> -	unsigned long flags;
>  	u32 val;
> -	int ret;
> -
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&ctrl->comp_lock, flags);
> -	ctrl->comp = &comp;
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctrl->comp_lock, flags);
> -	val = SWRM_REG_VAL_PACK(cmd_data, dev_addr,
> -				SWRM_SPECIAL_CMD_ID, reg_addr);
> -	ret = ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_WR_CMD, val);
> -	if (ret)
> -		goto err;
> -
> -	ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(ctrl->comp,
> -					  msecs_to_jiffies(TIMEOUT_MS));
> +	u8 id = *cmd_id;
>  
> -	if (!ret)
> -		ret = SDW_CMD_IGNORED;
> -	else
> -		ret = SDW_CMD_OK;
> -err:
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&ctrl->comp_lock, flags);
> -	ctrl->comp = NULL;
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctrl->comp_lock, flags);
> +	if (id != SWR_BROADCAST_CMD_ID) {
> +		if (id < 14)
> +			id += 1;
> +		else
> +			id = 0;
> +		*cmd_id = id;
> +	}
> +	val = SWRM_REG_VAL_PACK(cmd_data, dev_addr, id, reg_addr);
>  
> -	return ret;
> +	return val;
>  }
>  
> -static int qcom_swrm_cmd_fifo_rd_cmd(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl,
> -				     u8 dev_addr, u16 reg_addr,
> -				     u32 len, u8 *rval)
> +
> +static int qcom_swrm_cmd_fifo_wr_cmd(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *swrm, u8 cmd_data,
> +				     u8 dev_addr, u16 reg_addr)
>  {
> -	int i, ret;
> +
>  	u32 val;
> -	DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(comp);
> -	unsigned long flags;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +	u8 cmd_id = 0x0;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&swrm->io_lock);
> +	if (dev_addr == SDW_BROADCAST_DEV_NUM) {
> +		cmd_id = SWR_BROADCAST_CMD_ID;
> +		val = swrm_get_packed_reg_val(&cmd_id, cmd_data,
> +					      dev_addr, reg_addr);
> +	} else {
> +		val = swrm_get_packed_reg_val(&swrm->wcmd_id, cmd_data,
> +					      dev_addr, reg_addr);
> +	}
>  
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&ctrl->comp_lock, flags);
> -	ctrl->comp = &comp;
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctrl->comp_lock, flags);
> +	swrm->reg_write(swrm, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_WR_CMD, val);
>  
> -	val = SWRM_REG_VAL_PACK(len, dev_addr, SWRM_SPECIAL_CMD_ID, reg_addr);
> -	ret = ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_RD_CMD, val);
> -	if (ret)
> -		goto err;
> +	/* version 1.3 or less */
> +	if (swrm->version_major == 1 && swrm->version_minor <= 3)
> +		usleep_range(150, 155);
>  
> -	ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(ctrl->comp,
> -					  msecs_to_jiffies(TIMEOUT_MS));
> +	if (cmd_id == SWR_BROADCAST_CMD_ID) {
> +		/*
> +		 * sleep for 10ms for MSM soundwire variant to allow broadcast
> +		 * command to complete.
> +		 */
> +		ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&swrm->broadcast, (2 * HZ/10));
> +		if (!ret)
> +			ret = SDW_CMD_IGNORED;
> +		else
> +			ret = SDW_CMD_OK;
>  
> -	if (!ret) {
> -		ret = SDW_CMD_IGNORED;
> -		goto err;
>  	} else {
>  		ret = SDW_CMD_OK;
>  	}
> +	mutex_unlock(&swrm->io_lock);
> +	return ret;
> +}
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
> -		ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_RD_FIFO_ADDR, &val);
> -		rval[i] = val & 0xFF;
> +static int qcom_swrm_cmd_fifo_rd_cmd(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *swrm,
> +				     u8 dev_addr, u16 reg_addr,
> +				     u32 len, u8 *rval)
> +{
> +	u32 val;
> +	u32 retry_attempt = 0;
> +	u32 cmd_data;
> +	int ret = SDW_CMD_OK;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&swrm->io_lock);
> +	val = swrm_get_packed_reg_val(&swrm->rcmd_id, len, dev_addr, reg_addr);
> +
> +	/* wait for FIFO RD to complete to avoid overflow */
> +	usleep_range(100, 105);
> +	swrm->reg_write(swrm, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_RD_CMD, val);
> +	/* wait for FIFO RD CMD complete to avoid overflow */
> +	usleep_range(250, 255);
> +
> +retry_read:

do while{} ?

> +
> +	swrm->reg_read(swrm, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_RD_FIFO_ADDR, &cmd_data);
> +	rval[0] = cmd_data & 0xFF;
> +
> +	if ((((cmd_data) & 0xF00) >> 8) != swrm->rcmd_id) {
> +		if (retry_attempt < MAX_FIFO_RD_FAIL_RETRY) {
> +			/* wait 500 us before retry on fifo read failure */
> +			usleep_range(500, 505);
> +			if (retry_attempt == (MAX_FIFO_RD_FAIL_RETRY - 1)) {

why not do this at the end if retry fails, that will make code look
neater

> +				swrm->reg_write(swrm, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_CMD, 0x1);
> +				swrm->reg_write(swrm, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_RD_CMD, val);
> +			}
> +			retry_attempt++;
> +			goto retry_read;
> +		} else {
> +			dev_err(swrm->dev,
> +					"failed to read fifo: reg: 0x%x, \
> +					rcmd_id: 0x%x, dev_num: 0x%x, cmd_data: 0x%x\n",
> +					reg_addr, swrm->rcmd_id,
> +					dev_addr, cmd_data);

Do you want to log retry as err..?

> +			ret = SDW_CMD_IGNORED;
> +		}
>  	}
>  
> -err:
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&ctrl->comp_lock, flags);
> -	ctrl->comp = NULL;
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctrl->comp_lock, flags);
> +	mutex_unlock(&swrm->io_lock);
>  
>  	return ret;
>  }
> @@ -949,6 +991,8 @@ static int qcom_swrm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	dev_set_drvdata(&pdev->dev, ctrl);
>  	spin_lock_init(&ctrl->comp_lock);
>  	mutex_init(&ctrl->port_lock);
> +	mutex_init(&ctrl->io_lock);
> +	init_completion(&ctrl->broadcast);
>  	INIT_WORK(&ctrl->slave_work, qcom_swrm_slave_wq);
>  
>  	ctrl->bus.ops = &qcom_swrm_ops;
> -- 
> 2.21.0

-- 
~Vinod

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-02-01 14:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-29 17:32 [PATCH 0/6] soundwire: qcom: various improvements Srinivas Kandagatla
2021-01-29 17:32 ` [PATCH 1/6] soundwire: qcom: add support to missing transport params Srinivas Kandagatla
2021-01-29 19:20   ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-02-01 15:50     ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2021-02-01 16:33       ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-02-01 14:13   ` Vinod Koul
2021-02-01 15:50     ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2021-01-29 17:32 ` [PATCH 2/6] soundwire: qcom: extract version field Srinivas Kandagatla
2021-01-29 17:32 ` [PATCH 3/6] soundwire: qcom: set continue execution flag for ignored commands Srinivas Kandagatla
2021-01-29 19:21   ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-02-01 14:16   ` Vinod Koul
2021-02-01 15:50     ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2021-02-02  4:46       ` Vinod Koul
2021-01-29 17:32 ` [PATCH 4/6] soundwire: qcom: start the clock during initialization Srinivas Kandagatla
2021-02-01 14:21   ` Vinod Koul
2021-02-01 15:50     ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2021-02-02  4:46       ` Vinod Koul
2021-01-29 17:32 ` [PATCH 5/6] soundwire: qcom: update register read/write routine Srinivas Kandagatla
2021-01-29 19:33   ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-02-01 15:50     ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2021-02-01 16:42       ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-02-02 10:19         ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2021-02-02 16:58           ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-02-01 14:26   ` Vinod Koul [this message]
2021-02-01 15:50     ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2021-01-29 17:32 ` [PATCH 6/6] soundwire: qcom: add support to new interrupts Srinivas Kandagatla
2021-01-29 19:38   ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-02-01 15:51     ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2021-02-01 14:31   ` Vinod Koul
2021-02-01 15:51     ` Srinivas Kandagatla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210201142646.GD2771@vkoul-mobl \
    --to=vkoul@kernel.org \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=sanyog.r.kale@intel.com \
    --cc=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
    --cc=yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).