From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Bui Quang Minh <minhquangbui99@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] userfaultfd: Write protect when virtual memory range has no page table entry
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2021 09:32:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210320093237.c369eba59a0e5f452109c4ef@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210319152428.52683-1-minhquangbui99@gmail.com>
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 22:24:28 +0700 Bui Quang Minh <minhquangbui99@gmail.com> wrote:
> userfaultfd_writeprotect() use change_protection() to clear write bit in
> page table entries (pte/pmd). So, later write to this virtual address
> range causes a page fault, which is then handled by userspace program.
> However, change_protection() has no effect when there is no page table
> entries associated with that virtual memory range (a newly mapped memory
> range). As a result, later access to that memory range causes allocating a
> page table entry with write bit still set (due to VM_WRITE flag in
> vma->vm_flags).
>
> Add checks for VM_UFFD_WP in vma->vm_flags when allocating new page table
> entry in missing page table entry page fault path.
This sounds like a pretty significant bug?
Would it be possible to add a test to
tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c to check for this? It should
fail without your patch and succeed with it.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-20 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-19 15:24 [PATCH] userfaultfd: Write protect when virtual memory range has no page table entry Bui Quang Minh
2021-03-20 16:32 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2021-03-22 10:14 ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-22 10:23 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-03-22 13:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-03-22 13:27 ` Peter Xu
2021-03-22 13:49 ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-31 14:49 ` Michal Hocko
2021-04-01 0:24 ` Andrew Morton
2021-03-23 2:48 ` Bui Quang Minh
2021-03-23 15:12 ` Peter Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210320093237.c369eba59a0e5f452109c4ef@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minhquangbui99@gmail.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).