From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Restrict ARM64_BTI_KERNEL to clang 12.0.0 and newer
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 13:24:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210712122433.GA28536@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210709000627.3183718-1-nathan@kernel.org>
Hi Nathan,
On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 05:06:27PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> Commit 97fed779f2a6 ("arm64: bti: Provide Kconfig for kernel mode BTI")
> disabled CONFIG_ARM64_BTI_KERNEL when CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL was enabled and
> compilign with clang because of warnings that occur because LLVM was not
Typo: "compilign"
> emitting PAC/BTI instructions for compiler generated functions.
>
> This was an adequate fix to avoid the warnings with allmodconfig until
> commit 51c2ee6d121c ("Kconfig: Introduce ARCH_WANTS_NO_INSTR and
> CC_HAS_NO_PROFILE_FN_ATTR"), which prevented CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL from
> being selected with clang 12.0.0 and older because it does not support
> the no_profile_instrument_function attribute. As a result,
> CONFIG_ARM64_BTI_KERNEL gets enabled and there are more warnings of this
> nature.
I'm half asleep today, but I'm struggling to follow what GCOV_KERNEL has
to do with the warnings here. Prior to 51c2ee6d121c, you could still go
and turn that option off and so wouldn't the same warnings be triggered
in that configuration?
In other words, I think there are two aspects to this patch:
1. Removing the (now useless) !GCOV_KERNEL dependency
2. Requiring Clang >= version 12
but the commit message doesn't really say where these warnings are coming
from or why Clang 12 gets rid of them.
Thanks,
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-12 12:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-09 0:06 [PATCH] arm64: Restrict ARM64_BTI_KERNEL to clang 12.0.0 and newer Nathan Chancellor
2021-07-12 12:24 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2021-07-12 17:04 ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-07-12 21:46 ` [PATCH v2] " Nathan Chancellor
2021-07-12 23:15 ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-07-13 18:08 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210712122433.GA28536@willie-the-truck \
--to=will@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).