From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: nsaenzju@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Nitesh Lal <nilal@redhat.com>, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Alex Belits <abelits@marvell.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/4] add basic task isolation prctl interface
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 11:52:09 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210727145209.GA518735@fuller.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210727130930.GB283787@lothringen>
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 03:09:30PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 02:38:15PM +0200, nsaenzju@redhat.com wrote:
> > Hi Marcelo,
> >
> > On Tue, 2021-07-27 at 08:00 -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > OK, sorry if I'm being thick, but what is the benefit of having a distincnt
> > PR_ISOL_MODE instead expressing everything as PR_ISOL_FEATURES.
> >
> > PR_ISOL_MODE_NONE == Empty PR_ISOL_FEATURES bitmap
> >
> > PR_ISOL_MODE_NORMAL == Bitmap of commonly used PR_ISOL_FEATURES
> > (we could introduce a define)
> >
> > PR_ISOL_MODE_NORMAL+PR_ISOL_VSYSCALLS == Custom bitmap
> >
> > Other than that, my rationale is that if you extend PR_ISOL_MODE_NORMAL's
> > behaviour as new features are merged, wouldn't you be potentially breaking
> > userspace (i.e. older applications might not like the new default)?
>
> I agree with Nicolas, and that was Thomas request too.
> Let's leave policy implementation to userspace and take
> only the individual isolation features to the kernel.
>
> CPU/Task isolation is a relatively young feature and many users don't
> communicate much about their needs. We don't know exactly how finegrained
> the ABI will need to be so let's not make too many high level assumptions.
>
> It's easy for userspace to set all isolation bits by itself.
>
> Besides, those bits will be implemented one by one over time, this
> means that a prctl() bit saying "isolate everything" will have a different
> behaviour as those features get integrated. And we really want well defined
> behaviours.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
OK, how about this:
...
The meaning of isolated is specified as follows:
Isolation features
==================
- prctl(PR_ISOL_GET, ISOL_SUP_FEATURES, 0, 0, 0) returns the supported
features as a return value.
- prctl(PR_ISOL_SET, ISOL_FEATURES, bitmask, 0, 0) enables the features in
the bitmask.
- prctl(PR_ISOL_GET, ISOL_FEATURES, 0, 0, 0) returns the currently
enabled features.
The supported features are:
ISOL_F_QUIESCE_ON_URET: quiesce deferred actions on return to userspace.
----------------------
Quiescing of different actions can be performed on return to userspace.
- prctl(PR_ISOL_GET, PR_ISOL_SUP_QUIESCE_CFG, 0, 0, 0) returns
the supported actions to be quiesced.
- prctl(PR_ISOL_SET, PR_ISOL_QUIESCE_CFG, quiesce_bitmask, 0, 0) returns
the currently supported actions to be quiesced.
- prctl(PR_ISOL_GET, PR_ISOL_QUIESCE_CFG, 0, 0, 0) returns
the currently enabled actions to be quiesced.
#define ISOL_F_QUIESCE_VMSTAT_SYNC (1<<0)
#define ISOL_F_QUIESCE_NOHZ_FULL (1<<1)
#define ISOL_F_QUIESCE_DEFER_TLB_FLUSH (1<<2)
...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-27 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-27 10:38 [patch 0/4] prctl task isolation interface and vmstat sync Marcelo Tosatti
2021-07-27 10:38 ` [patch 1/4] add basic task isolation prctl interface Marcelo Tosatti
2021-07-27 10:48 ` nsaenzju
2021-07-27 11:00 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-07-27 12:38 ` nsaenzju
2021-07-27 13:06 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-07-27 13:08 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-07-27 13:09 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-07-27 14:52 ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2021-07-27 23:45 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-07-28 9:37 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-07-28 11:45 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-07-28 13:21 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-07-28 21:22 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-07-28 11:55 ` nsaenzju
2021-07-28 13:16 ` Marcelo Tosatti
[not found] ` <CAFki+LkQwoqVTKmgnwLQQM8ua-ixbLp8i+jUT6xF15k6X=89mw@mail.gmail.com>
2021-07-28 16:21 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-07-28 17:08 ` nsaenzju
[not found] ` <CAFki+LmHeXmSFze8YEHFNbYA5hLEtnZyk37Yjf-eyOuKa8Os4w@mail.gmail.com>
2021-07-28 16:17 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-07-27 10:38 ` [patch 2/4] task isolation: sync vmstats on return to userspace Marcelo Tosatti
2021-07-27 10:38 ` [patch 3/4] mm: vmstat: move need_update Marcelo Tosatti
2021-07-27 10:38 ` [patch 4/4] mm: vmstat_refresh: avoid queueing work item if cpu stats are clean Marcelo Tosatti
2021-07-30 20:18 [patch 0/4] extensible prctl task isolation interface and vmstat sync (v2) Marcelo Tosatti
2021-07-30 20:18 ` [patch 1/4] add basic task isolation prctl interface Marcelo Tosatti
[not found] ` <CAFki+Lnf0cs62Se0aPubzYxP9wh7xjMXn7RXEPvrmtBdYBrsow@mail.gmail.com>
2021-07-31 0:49 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-07-31 7:47 ` kernel test robot
[not found] ` <CAFki+LkQVQOe+5aNEKWDvLdnjWjxzKWOiqOvBZzeuPWX+G=XgA@mail.gmail.com>
2021-08-02 14:16 ` Marcelo Tosatti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210727145209.GA518735@fuller.cnet \
--to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=abelits@marvell.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nilal@redhat.com \
--cc=nsaenzju@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).