From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Nadezda Lutovinova <lutovinova@ispras.ru>
Cc: Marc Hulsman <m.hulsman@tudelft.nl>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>,
Rudolf Marek <r.marek@assembler.cz>,
linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ldv-project@linuxtesting.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwmon: Correct the error handling in w83793.c, w83791d.c, w83792d.c
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 11:18:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210811181844.GB3138792@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210811161515.17842-2-lutovinova@ispras.ru>
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 07:15:15PM +0300, Nadezda Lutovinova wrote:
> If driver read tmp (or val) value sufficient for
> (tmp & 0x08) && (!(tmp & 0x80)) && ((tmp & 0x7) == ((tmp >> 4) & 0x7))
> from device then Null pointer dereference occurs.
> (It is possible if tmp = 0b0xyz1xyz, where same literals mean same numbers)
>
> The patch adds checking if data->lm75[0] is NULL.
>
> Found by Linux Driver Verification project (linuxtesting.org).
>
One patch per driver, please.
> Signed-off-by: Nadezda Lutovinova <lutovinova@ispras.ru>
> ---
> drivers/hwmon/w83791d.c | 2 +-
> drivers/hwmon/w83792d.c | 2 +-
> drivers/hwmon/w83793.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/w83791d.c b/drivers/hwmon/w83791d.c
> index 37b25a1474c4..8b30bbfafaa7 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/w83791d.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/w83791d.c
> @@ -1284,7 +1284,7 @@ static int w83791d_detect_subclients(struct i2c_client *client)
> data->lm75[0] = devm_i2c_new_dummy_device(&client->dev, adapter,
> 0x48 + (val & 0x7));
> if (!(val & 0x80)) {
> - if (!IS_ERR(data->lm75[0]) &&
> + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(data->lm75[0]) &&
> ((val & 0x7) == ((val >> 4) & 0x7))) {
> dev_err(&client->dev,
> "duplicate addresses 0x%x, "
As you pointed out in te other e-mail, lm75[] does not really serve
a purpose anymore. It might be much better to replace this code with
something like
if (!(val & 0x88) && (val & 0x7) == ((val >> 4) & 0x7)) {
dev_err(&new_client->dev,
"duplicate addresses 0x%x, use force_subclient\n",
0x48 + (val & 0x7));
return -ENODEV;
}
Same for the other chips.
Guenter
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/w83792d.c b/drivers/hwmon/w83792d.c
> index abd5c3a722b9..85ae12d950e1 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/w83792d.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/w83792d.c
> @@ -950,7 +950,7 @@ w83792d_detect_subclients(struct i2c_client *new_client)
> data->lm75[0] = devm_i2c_new_dummy_device(&new_client->dev, adapter,
> 0x48 + (val & 0x7));
> if (!(val & 0x80)) {
> - if (!IS_ERR(data->lm75[0]) &&
> + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(data->lm75[0]) &&
> ((val & 0x7) == ((val >> 4) & 0x7))) {
> dev_err(&new_client->dev,
> "duplicate addresses 0x%x, use force_subclient\n",
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/w83793.c b/drivers/hwmon/w83793.c
> index e7d0484eabe4..9d8c44e2fa6e 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/w83793.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/w83793.c
> @@ -1590,7 +1590,7 @@ w83793_detect_subclients(struct i2c_client *client)
> data->lm75[0] = devm_i2c_new_dummy_device(&client->dev, adapter,
> 0x48 + (tmp & 0x7));
> if (!(tmp & 0x80)) {
> - if (!IS_ERR(data->lm75[0])
> + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(data->lm75[0])
> && ((tmp & 0x7) == ((tmp >> 4) & 0x7))) {
> dev_err(&client->dev,
> "duplicate addresses 0x%x, "
> --
> 2.17.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-11 18:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-11 16:15 hwmon: Error handling in w83793.c, w83791d.c, w83792d.c Nadezda Lutovinova
2021-08-11 16:15 ` [PATCH] hwmon: Correct the error " Nadezda Lutovinova
2021-08-11 18:18 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2021-09-21 15:51 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] hwmon: (w83791d) Fix NULL pointer dereference by removing unnecessary structure field Nadezda Lutovinova
2021-10-02 12:07 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-09-21 15:51 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] hwmon: (w83792d) " Nadezda Lutovinova
2021-10-02 12:12 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-09-21 15:51 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] hwmon: (w83793) " Nadezda Lutovinova
2021-10-02 12:15 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-08-11 17:51 ` hwmon: Error handling in w83793.c, w83791d.c, w83792d.c Guenter Roeck
2021-08-11 18:19 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210811181844.GB3138792@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
--cc=ldv-project@linuxtesting.org \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lutovinova@ispras.ru \
--cc=m.hulsman@tudelft.nl \
--cc=r.marek@assembler.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).