linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 20 (Wno-alloc-size-larger-than)
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 22:48:56 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202108202248.921E8C66@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2706a406-9f72-7df1-03f6-f8e852897eb2@infradead.org>

On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 02:54:05PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 8/20/21 2:26 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Changes since 20210819:
> > 
> 
> Both linux-next and mmotm have many of these warnings when using
> gcc (SUSE Linux) 7.5.0:
> 
> cc1: warning: unrecognized command line option '-Wno-alloc-size-larger-than'

Ew. Thanks for letting me know. I thought I'd verified this existed in
gcc going back to 4.9, but it looks like I did something wrong in that
test.

I think this should fix it:

diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index b0fafc41b686..e33ffa05899e 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -1097,7 +1097,7 @@ endif
 ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_GCC
 # The allocators already balk at large sizes, so silence the compiler
 # warnings for bounds checks involving those possible values.
-KBUILD_CFLAGS += -Wno-alloc-size-larger-than
+KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option, -Wno-alloc-size-larger-than)
 endif
 
 # disable invalid "can't wrap" optimizations for signed / pointers

-- 
Kees Cook

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-21  5:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-20  9:26 linux-next: Tree for Aug 20 Stephen Rothwell
2021-08-20 21:54 ` linux-next: Tree for Aug 20 (Wno-alloc-size-larger-than) Randy Dunlap
2021-08-21  5:48   ` Kees Cook [this message]
2021-08-21 19:09     ` Randy Dunlap
2021-08-23 10:37       ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-08-24  1:24         ` Randy Dunlap
2021-08-24  1:58           ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-08-25  1:59             ` Kees Cook
2021-08-25 17:04             ` Kees Cook
2021-08-25 17:49               ` Randy Dunlap
2021-08-26  3:54                 ` Kees Cook
2021-08-26  5:10                   ` Randy Dunlap
2021-08-26  5:23                     ` Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202108202248.921E8C66@keescook \
    --to=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).