From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE107C4320E for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 14:26:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BF4060F4B for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 14:26:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237545AbhH3O1n convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Aug 2021 10:27:43 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:38134 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237522AbhH3O1l (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Aug 2021 10:27:41 -0400 Received: from jic23-huawei (cpc108967-cmbg20-2-0-cust86.5-4.cable.virginm.net [81.101.6.87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 58EEE60F45; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 14:26:45 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 15:29:56 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: "Sa, Nuno" Cc: Miquel Raynal , Lars-Peter Clausen , Thomas Petazzoni , "linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/16] iio: adc: max1027: Push only the requested samples Message-ID: <20210830152956.58331a8d@jic23-huawei> In-Reply-To: References: <20210818111139.330636-1-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> <20210818111139.330636-4-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> <20210830110756.733d5201@jic23-huawei> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.0.0 (GTK+ 3.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 30 Aug 2021 10:49:50 +0000 "Sa, Nuno" wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jonathan Cameron > > Sent: Monday, August 30, 2021 12:08 PM > > To: Sa, Nuno > > Cc: Miquel Raynal ; Lars-Peter Clausen > > ; Thomas Petazzoni > > ; linux-iio@vger.kernel.org; linux- > > kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/16] iio: adc: max1027: Push only the requested > > samples > > > > [External] > > > > On Fri, 20 Aug 2021 07:10:48 +0000 > > "Sa, Nuno" wrote: > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Miquel Raynal > > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2021 1:11 PM > > > > To: Jonathan Cameron ; Lars-Peter Clausen > > > > > > > > Cc: Thomas Petazzoni ; linux- > > > > iio@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Miquel Raynal > > > > > > > > Subject: [PATCH 03/16] iio: adc: max1027: Push only the requested > > > > samples > > > > > > > > [External] > > > > > > > > When a triggered scan occurs, the identity of the desired channels > > is > > > > known in indio_dev->active_scan_mask. Instead of reading and > > > > pushing to > > > > the IIO buffers all channels each time, scan the minimum amount > > of > > > > channels (0 to maximum requested chan, to be exact) and only > > > > provide the > > > > samples requested by the user. > > > > > > > > For example, if the user wants channels 1, 4 and 5, all channels > > from > > > > 0 to 5 will be scanned but only the desired channels will be pushed > > to > > > > the IIO buffers. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal > > > > --- > > > > drivers/iio/adc/max1027.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++---- > > > > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/max1027.c b/drivers/iio/adc/max1027.c > > > > index b753658bb41e..8ab660f596b5 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/max1027.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/max1027.c > > > > @@ -360,6 +360,9 @@ static int max1027_set_trigger_state(struct > > > > iio_trigger *trig, bool state) > > > > struct max1027_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev); > > > > int ret; > > > > > > > > + if (bitmap_empty(indio_dev->active_scan_mask, indio_dev- > > > > >masklength)) > > > > + return -EINVAL; > > > > + > > > > > > I'm not sure this can actually happen. If you try to enable the buffer > > > with no scan element, it should give you an error before you reach > > > this point... > > > > > > > if (state) { > > > > /* Start acquisition on cnvst */ > > > > st->reg = MAX1027_SETUP_REG | > > > > MAX1027_CKS_MODE0 | > > > > @@ -368,9 +371,12 @@ static int max1027_set_trigger_state(struct > > > > iio_trigger *trig, bool state) > > > > if (ret < 0) > > > > return ret; > > > > > > > > - /* Scan from 0 to max */ > > > > - st->reg = MAX1027_CONV_REG | MAX1027_CHAN(0) | > > > > - MAX1027_SCAN_N_M | MAX1027_TEMP; > > > > + /* > > > > + * Scan from 0 to the highest requested channel. The > > > > temperature > > > > + * could be avoided but it simplifies a bit the logic. > > > > + */ > > > > + st->reg = MAX1027_CONV_REG | > > > > MAX1027_SCAN_0_N | MAX1027_TEMP; > > > > + st->reg |= MAX1027_CHAN(fls(*indio_dev- > > > > >active_scan_mask) - 2); > > > > ret = spi_write(st->spi, &st->reg, 1); > > > > if (ret < 0) > > > > return ret; > > > > @@ -391,11 +397,22 @@ static irqreturn_t > > > > max1027_trigger_handler(int irq, void *private) > > > > struct iio_poll_func *pf = private; > > > > struct iio_dev *indio_dev = pf->indio_dev; > > > > struct max1027_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev); > > > > + unsigned int scanned_chans = fls(*indio_dev- > > > > >active_scan_mask); > > > > + u16 *buf = st->buffer; > > > > > > I think sparse will complain here. buffer is a __be16 restricted > > > type so you should not mix those... > > > > + unsigned int bit; > > > > > > > > pr_debug("%s(irq=%d, private=0x%p)\n", __func__, irq, > > > > > > private);in/20210818_miquel_raynal_bring_software_triggers_support > > _to_max1027_like_adcs.mbx > > > > > > > > /* fill buffer with all channel */ > > > > - spi_read(st->spi, st->buffer, indio_dev->masklength * 2); > > > > + spi_read(st->spi, st->buffer, scanned_chans * 2); > > > > + > > > > + /* Only keep the channels selected by the user */ > > > > + for_each_set_bit(bit, indio_dev->active_scan_mask, > > > > + indio_dev->masklength) { > > > > + if (buf[0] != st->buffer[bit]) > > > > + buf[0] = st->buffer[bit]; > > > > > > Since we are here, when looking into the driver, I realized > > > that st->buffer is not DMA safe. In IIO, we kind of want to enforce > > > that all buffers that are passed to spi/i2c buses are safe... Maybe > > > this is something you can include in your series. > > > > Why is it not? st->buffer is result of a devm_kmalloc_array() call and > > that should provide a DMA safe buffer as I understand it. > > > > That's a good question. I'm not sure how I came to that conclusion which > is clearly wrong. Though I think the buffer might share the line with the > mutex... Pointer shares a line. The buffer it points to doesn't as allocated by separate heap allocation. J > > - Nuno Sá >