Re: [PATCH 1/3] hwmon: (nct6775) Use sio_data in superio_* (v2)

[Denis Pauk <pauk.denis@gmail.com>]

Thanks for the feedback!

On Thu, 9 Sep 2021 19:50:02 +0300
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 12:36:02AM +0300, Denis Pauk wrote:
> 
> Thanks for your contribution!
> My comments below.
> 
> > Rearrange code for directly use struct nct6775_sio_data in superio_*
> > functions  
> 
> Missed period.
> 
> We refer to the functions as superio_*().
> 
> The commit message may need more elaboration (why you are doing this).
> 
> > v2: split changes to separate patches  
> 
> This should go after '---' (cutter) line below. But entire series
> needs: 1) a proper versioning (use `git format-patch -v<n> ...`)
> 2) to NOT be a continuation of the previous one (start a new thread!)
> 3) to have a cover letter (use `git format-patch --cover-letter`)
> 
> > Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204807  
> 
> BugLink
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Bernhard Seibold <mail@bernhard-seibold.de>
> > Signed-off-by: Denis Pauk <pauk.denis@gmail.com>  
> 
> This is wrong. My understanding that you have to preserve Bernhard's
> authorship and add yourself as Co-developer (see Submitting Patches on
> how to properly use tags).
> 
> ...


Should it be such ?

----
BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204807
Signed-off-by: Denis Pauk <pauk.denis@gmail.com>
Co-Developed-by: Bernhard Seibold <mail@bernhard-seibold.de>
----


> 
> > +struct nct6775_sio_data {  
> 
> > +	int sioreg;  
> 
> It should be unsigned short.
> 
> > +	enum kinds kind;
> > +};  
> 

Should I change all occurrences of sioreg to unsigned short?
Before my patch it was integer. 

--
Best regards,
                  Denis.