linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Rammhold <andreas@rammhold.de>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andreas Rammhold <andreas@rammhold.de>,
	Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>,
	James Bottomley <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
	Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
	Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>,
	linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] KEYS: trusted: Fix trusted key backends when building as module
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 22:08:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210927200835.wvazk73cek3t5tkf@wrt> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <856359f263575f01d0ce2fcf8f042321f750b38c.camel@linux.ibm.com>

On 07:27 27.09.21, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Mon, 2021-09-27 at 10:51 +0200, Andreas Rammhold wrote:
> > On 09:47 13.09.21, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> > > Dear trusted key maintainers,
> > > 
> > > On 30.07.21 03:28, Andreas Rammhold wrote:
> > > > Before this commit the kernel could end up with no trusted key sources
> > > > even though both of the currently supported backends (TPM and TEE) were
> > > > compiled as modules. This manifested in the trusted key type not being
> > > > registered at all.
> > > > 
> > > > When checking if a CONFIG_… preprocessor variable is defined we only
> > > > test for the builtin (=y) case and not the module (=m) case. By using
> > > > the IS_REACHABLE() macro we do test for both cases.
> > > > 
> > > > Fixes: 5d0682be3189 ("KEYS: trusted: Add generic trusted keys framework")
> > > > Signed-off-by: Andreas Rammhold <andreas@rammhold.de>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
> > > Does anyone intend to pick this up?
> > 
> > Did this end up in any tree by now? I am wondering if I should resend
> > the patch instead. Perhaps it was just overlooked?
> 
> For EVM environments only using trusted and encrypted keys, not file
> signatures, the trusted key is needed to decrypt the "master" key in
> order to verify kernel modules.

So what you are saying is that right now (before this patch & after this
patch) you could compile a kernel that wouldn't be able to load any
modules when the trusted keychain part is built as module?


Andi

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-27 20:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-30  1:28 [PATCH v3] KEYS: trusted: Fix trusted key backends when building as module Andreas Rammhold
2021-07-30  4:54 ` Sumit Garg
2021-07-30  6:14 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2021-09-13  7:47 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2021-09-27  8:51   ` Andreas Rammhold
2021-09-27 11:27     ` Mimi Zohar
2021-09-27 20:08       ` Andreas Rammhold [this message]
2021-09-27 20:33         ` Mimi Zohar
2021-09-27 20:55           ` Andreas Rammhold
2021-09-27 21:31             ` Mimi Zohar
2021-10-02 21:47               ` Andreas Rammhold
2021-10-11 10:19                 ` Ahmad Fatoum

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210927200835.wvazk73cek3t5tkf@wrt \
    --to=andreas@rammhold.de \
    --cc=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=sumit.garg@linaro.org \
    --cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).