From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 23/23] objtool, kcsan: Remove memory barrier instrumentation from noinstr
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 09:53:03 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211124175303.nwuk2zlnwkr7fj5f@treble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YZzQoz0e/oiutuq5@elver.google.com>
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 12:29:39PM +0100, Marco Elver wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 12:31PM -0800, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 09:10:27AM +0100, Marco Elver wrote:
> [...]
> > > + if (insn->sec->noinstr && sym->removable_instr) {
> [...]
> > I'd love to have a clearer name than 'removable_instr', though I'm
> > having trouble coming up with something.
> [...]
>
> I now have the below as v3 of this patch. The naming isn't entirely
> obvious, but coming up with a short name for this is tricky, but
> hopefully the comments make it clear. We can of course still pick
> another name.
>
> Does that look reasonable?
>
> Note, I'd like this series to sit in -next for a while (probably from
> some time next week after sending v3 if there are no further
> complaints). By default everything will be picked up by the -rcu tree,
> and we're targeting Linux 5.18.
>
> If you feel there might be objtool conflicts coming, this patch could be
> taken through another tree as there are no hard dependencies, as long as
> this patch reaches mainline before or with the rest.
>
> Thanks,
> -- Marco
Looks good to me. I don't know of any upcoming conflicts, feel free to
carry it with your series for now.
Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
--
Josh
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-24 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-18 8:10 [PATCH v2 00/23] kcsan: Support detecting a subset of missing memory barriers Marco Elver
2021-11-18 8:10 ` [PATCH v2 01/23] kcsan: Refactor reading of instrumented memory Marco Elver
2021-11-18 11:08 ` Mark Rutland
2021-11-18 8:10 ` [PATCH v2 02/23] kcsan: Remove redundant zero-initialization of globals Marco Elver
2021-11-18 11:09 ` Mark Rutland
2021-11-18 8:10 ` [PATCH v2 03/23] kcsan: Avoid checking scoped accesses from nested contexts Marco Elver
2021-11-29 8:47 ` Boqun Feng
2021-11-29 10:57 ` Marco Elver
2021-11-29 14:26 ` Boqun Feng
2021-11-29 14:42 ` Marco Elver
2021-11-18 8:10 ` [PATCH v2 04/23] kcsan: Add core support for a subset of weak memory modeling Marco Elver
2021-11-18 8:10 ` [PATCH v2 05/23] kcsan: Add core memory barrier instrumentation functions Marco Elver
2021-11-18 8:10 ` [PATCH v2 06/23] kcsan, kbuild: Add option for barrier instrumentation only Marco Elver
2021-11-18 8:10 ` [PATCH v2 07/23] kcsan: Call scoped accesses reordered in reports Marco Elver
2021-11-18 8:10 ` [PATCH v2 08/23] kcsan: Show location access was reordered to Marco Elver
2021-11-18 8:10 ` [PATCH v2 09/23] kcsan: Document modeling of weak memory Marco Elver
2021-11-18 8:10 ` [PATCH v2 10/23] kcsan: test: Match reordered or normal accesses Marco Elver
2021-11-18 8:10 ` [PATCH v2 11/23] kcsan: test: Add test cases for memory barrier instrumentation Marco Elver
2021-11-18 8:10 ` [PATCH v2 12/23] kcsan: Ignore GCC 11+ warnings about TSan runtime support Marco Elver
2021-11-18 8:10 ` [PATCH v2 13/23] kcsan: selftest: Add test case to check memory barrier instrumentation Marco Elver
2021-11-18 8:10 ` [PATCH v2 14/23] locking/barriers, kcsan: Add instrumentation for barriers Marco Elver
2021-11-18 8:10 ` [PATCH v2 15/23] locking/barriers, kcsan: Support generic instrumentation Marco Elver
2021-11-18 8:10 ` [PATCH v2 16/23] locking/atomics, kcsan: Add instrumentation for barriers Marco Elver
2021-11-18 8:10 ` [PATCH v2 17/23] asm-generic/bitops, " Marco Elver
2021-11-18 8:10 ` [PATCH v2 18/23] x86/barriers, kcsan: Use generic instrumentation for non-smp barriers Marco Elver
2021-11-18 8:10 ` [PATCH v2 19/23] x86/qspinlock, kcsan: Instrument barrier of pv_queued_spin_unlock() Marco Elver
2021-11-18 8:10 ` [PATCH v2 20/23] mm, kcsan: Enable barrier instrumentation Marco Elver
2021-11-18 8:10 ` [PATCH v2 21/23] sched, kcsan: Enable memory " Marco Elver
2021-11-18 8:10 ` [PATCH v2 22/23] objtool, kcsan: Add memory barrier instrumentation to whitelist Marco Elver
2021-11-18 8:10 ` [PATCH v2 23/23] objtool, kcsan: Remove memory barrier instrumentation from noinstr Marco Elver
2021-11-19 20:31 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-11-19 21:31 ` Marco Elver
2021-11-23 11:29 ` Marco Elver
2021-11-24 17:53 ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211124175303.nwuk2zlnwkr7fj5f@treble \
--to=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).