From: Andrew Kilroy <andrew.kilroy@arm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
acme@kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Kilroy <andrew.kilroy@arm.com>,
John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/1] topdown with metrics
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 18:42:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211214184240.24215-1-andrew.kilroy@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4c375d34-bf20-496d-22fc-aed8597126e2@huawei.com>
Hi John,
> BTW, I was looking at adding perf tool --topdown support for arm64. This will require L1 metricgroup support per core - see what I did here for our hisilicon platform already:
>
> [0] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/hisilicon/hip08/metrics.json
>
> I would like to add support for more cores. Generally the arm common events match up to the definitions here:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-stat.txt#n400
>
> Apart from frontend_bound - would you have an equivalent metric expression for this for these Neoverse cores?
>
> [0] Note that I think that the divisor in the metric expressions is max uops that the core can deal with.
Thanks for this, we’ve been working on how to support perf --topdown.
We’re still considering the right events/calculations on our CPUs.
To introduce the calculations in metrics jsons we would like this patch
to alter the --topdown option on arm64.
How does this fit with your solution?
Andrew
Andrew Kilroy (1):
perf arm64: Implement --topdown with metrics
tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/Build | 1 +
tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/topdown.c | 8 ++++++++
tools/perf/builtin-stat.c | 13 +++++++++++++
tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c | 12 ++++++++++++
tools/perf/util/metricgroup.h | 7 +++++++
tools/perf/util/topdown.c | 6 ++++++
tools/perf/util/topdown.h | 1 +
7 files changed, 48 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/topdown.c
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-14 18:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-10 12:37 [PATCH v2 0/2] perf vendor events: Arm Neoverse N2 Andrew Kilroy
2021-12-10 12:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] perf vendor events: For the " Andrew Kilroy
2021-12-10 13:21 ` John Garry
2021-12-14 18:42 ` Andrew Kilroy [this message]
2021-12-14 18:42 ` [RFC PATCH 1/1] perf arm64: Implement --topdown with metrics Andrew Kilroy
2021-12-14 20:32 ` Ian Rogers
2021-12-15 10:38 ` James Clark
2021-12-15 10:52 ` John Garry
2021-12-15 12:38 ` Andrew Kilroy
2021-12-15 12:53 ` John Garry
2022-01-06 16:33 ` Andrew Kilroy
2022-01-06 18:24 ` John Garry
2022-01-11 15:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] topdown " Andrew Kilroy
2022-01-11 15:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/5] perf stat: Implement --topdown " Andrew Kilroy
2022-01-28 13:44 ` John Garry
2022-01-11 15:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/5] perf stat: Topdown kernel events setup function Andrew Kilroy
2022-01-11 15:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] perf stat: Topdown json metrics " Andrew Kilroy
2022-01-11 15:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/5] perf stat: Detect if topdown kernel events supported Andrew Kilroy
2022-01-11 15:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/5] perf stat: Ensure only topdown kernel events used on x86 Andrew Kilroy
2022-01-20 9:26 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] topdown with metrics John Garry
2022-01-20 16:22 ` Al Grant
2022-01-27 11:42 ` Andrew Kilroy
2022-02-08 15:58 ` Andrew Kilroy
2021-12-20 17:21 ` [RFC PATCH 1/1] perf arm64: Implement --topdown " Andrew Kilroy
2021-12-21 14:03 ` Andi Kleen
2022-01-27 11:11 ` Andrew Kilroy
2021-12-17 10:19 ` John Garry
2021-12-21 14:31 ` Andrew Kilroy
2022-01-05 16:58 ` Andrew Kilroy
2022-01-28 18:00 ` John Garry
2021-12-10 12:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] perf vendor events: Rename arm64 arch std event files Andrew Kilroy
2021-12-10 13:46 ` John Garry
2021-12-10 19:01 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211214184240.24215-1-andrew.kilroy@arm.com \
--to=andrew.kilroy@arm.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).