linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	x86@kernel.org, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	Joao Moreira <joao@overdrivepizza.com>,
	Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
	Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v3 07/20] lkdtm: Emit an indirect call for CFI tests
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 16:35:00 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220610233513.1798771-8-samitolvanen@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220610233513.1798771-1-samitolvanen@google.com>

Clang can convert the indirect calls in lkdtm_CFI_FORWARD_PROTO into
direct calls. Move the call into a noinline function that accepts the
target address as an argument to ensure the compiler actually emits an
indirect call instead.

Signed-off-by: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
---
 drivers/misc/lkdtm/cfi.c | 15 +++++++++------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/cfi.c b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/cfi.c
index 666a7f4bc137..b6b375112a2a 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/cfi.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/cfi.c
@@ -20,6 +20,13 @@ static noinline int lkdtm_increment_int(int *counter)
 
 	return *counter;
 }
+
+/* Don't allow the compiler to inline the calls. */
+static noinline void lkdtm_indirect_call(void (*func)(int *))
+{
+	func(&called_count);
+}
+
 /*
  * This tries to call an indirect function with a mismatched prototype.
  */
@@ -29,15 +36,11 @@ static void lkdtm_CFI_FORWARD_PROTO(void)
 	 * Matches lkdtm_increment_void()'s prototype, but not
 	 * lkdtm_increment_int()'s prototype.
 	 */
-	void (*func)(int *);
-
 	pr_info("Calling matched prototype ...\n");
-	func = lkdtm_increment_void;
-	func(&called_count);
+	lkdtm_indirect_call(lkdtm_increment_void);
 
 	pr_info("Calling mismatched prototype ...\n");
-	func = (void *)lkdtm_increment_int;
-	func(&called_count);
+	lkdtm_indirect_call((void *)lkdtm_increment_int);
 
 	pr_err("FAIL: survived mismatched prototype function call!\n");
 	pr_expected_config(CONFIG_CFI_CLANG);
-- 
2.36.1.476.g0c4daa206d-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-06-10 23:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-10 23:34 [RFC PATCH v3 00/20] KCFI support Sami Tolvanen
2022-06-10 23:34 ` [RFC PATCH v3 01/20] treewide: Filter out CC_FLAGS_CFI Sami Tolvanen
2022-06-10 23:34 ` [RFC PATCH v3 02/20] scripts/kallsyms: Ignore __kcfi_typeid_ Sami Tolvanen
2022-06-10 23:34 ` [RFC PATCH v3 03/20] cfi: Remove CONFIG_CFI_CLANG_SHADOW Sami Tolvanen
2022-06-10 23:34 ` [RFC PATCH v3 04/20] cfi: Drop __CFI_ADDRESSABLE Sami Tolvanen
2022-06-10 23:34 ` [RFC PATCH v3 05/20] cfi: Switch to -fsanitize=kcfi Sami Tolvanen
2022-06-10 23:34 ` [RFC PATCH v3 06/20] cfi: Add type helper macros Sami Tolvanen
2022-06-10 23:35 ` Sami Tolvanen [this message]
2022-06-10 23:43   ` [RFC PATCH v3 07/20] lkdtm: Emit an indirect call for CFI tests Nick Desaulniers
2022-06-11  6:01   ` Kees Cook
2022-06-10 23:35 ` [RFC PATCH v3 08/20] arm64: Add types to indirect called assembly functions Sami Tolvanen
2022-06-10 23:35 ` [RFC PATCH v3 09/20] arm64: Add CFI error handling Sami Tolvanen
2022-06-10 23:35 ` [RFC PATCH v3 10/20] arm64: Drop unneeded __nocfi attributes Sami Tolvanen
2022-06-10 23:35 ` [RFC PATCH v3 11/20] init: Drop __nocfi from __init Sami Tolvanen
2022-06-10 23:35 ` [RFC PATCH v3 12/20] treewide: Drop function_nocfi Sami Tolvanen
2022-06-10 23:35 ` [RFC PATCH v3 13/20] treewide: Drop WARN_ON_FUNCTION_MISMATCH Sami Tolvanen
2022-06-10 23:35 ` [RFC PATCH v3 14/20] treewide: Drop __cficanonical Sami Tolvanen
2022-06-10 23:35 ` [RFC PATCH v3 15/20] objtool: Disable CFI warnings Sami Tolvanen
2022-06-13 16:10   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-06-10 23:35 ` [RFC PATCH v3 16/20] kallsyms: Drop CONFIG_CFI_CLANG workarounds Sami Tolvanen
2022-06-10 23:40   ` Nick Desaulniers
2022-06-13 19:19     ` Bill Wendling
2022-06-10 23:35 ` [RFC PATCH v3 17/20] x86/tools/relocs: Ignore __kcfi_typeid_ relocations Sami Tolvanen
2022-06-10 23:35 ` [RFC PATCH v3 18/20] x86: Add types to indirectly called assembly functions Sami Tolvanen
2022-06-10 23:35 ` [RFC PATCH v3 19/20] x86/purgatory: Disable CFI Sami Tolvanen
2022-06-10 23:35 ` [RFC PATCH v3 20/20] x86: Add support for CONFIG_CFI_CLANG Sami Tolvanen
2022-07-23 11:21   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-07-26  0:09     ` Sami Tolvanen
2022-06-13 17:04 ` [RFC PATCH v3 00/20] KCFI support Kees Cook
2022-07-18 21:46   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-07-19 13:36   ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220610233513.1798771-8-samitolvanen@google.com \
    --to=samitolvanen@google.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=joao@overdrivepizza.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sedat.dilek@gmail.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).