linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
	Jacob jun Pan <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 06/12] iommu/vt-d: Acquiring lock in domain ID allocation helpers
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2022 10:51:31 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220614025137.1632762-7-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220614025137.1632762-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>

The iommu->lock is used to protect the per-IOMMU domain ID resource.
Moving the lock into the ID alloc/free helpers makes the code more
compact. At the same time, the device_domain_lock is irrelevant to
the domain ID resource, remove its assertion as well.

On the other hand, the iommu->lock is never used in interrupt context,
there's no need to use the irqsave variant of the spinlock calls.

Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 25 +++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
index b2ef8af0c3f3..8fdaa01ef10d 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
@@ -1782,16 +1782,13 @@ static struct dmar_domain *alloc_domain(unsigned int type)
 	return domain;
 }
 
-/* Must be called with iommu->lock */
 static int domain_attach_iommu(struct dmar_domain *domain,
 			       struct intel_iommu *iommu)
 {
 	unsigned long ndomains;
-	int num;
-
-	assert_spin_locked(&device_domain_lock);
-	assert_spin_locked(&iommu->lock);
+	int num, ret = 0;
 
+	spin_lock(&iommu->lock);
 	domain->iommu_refcnt[iommu->seq_id] += 1;
 	if (domain->iommu_refcnt[iommu->seq_id] == 1) {
 		ndomains = cap_ndoms(iommu->cap);
@@ -1800,7 +1797,8 @@ static int domain_attach_iommu(struct dmar_domain *domain,
 		if (num >= ndomains) {
 			pr_err("%s: No free domain ids\n", iommu->name);
 			domain->iommu_refcnt[iommu->seq_id] -= 1;
-			return -ENOSPC;
+			ret = -ENOSPC;
+			goto out_unlock;
 		}
 
 		set_bit(num, iommu->domain_ids);
@@ -1809,7 +1807,9 @@ static int domain_attach_iommu(struct dmar_domain *domain,
 		domain_update_iommu_cap(domain);
 	}
 
-	return 0;
+out_unlock:
+	spin_unlock(&iommu->lock);
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static void domain_detach_iommu(struct dmar_domain *domain,
@@ -1817,9 +1817,7 @@ static void domain_detach_iommu(struct dmar_domain *domain,
 {
 	int num;
 
-	assert_spin_locked(&device_domain_lock);
-	assert_spin_locked(&iommu->lock);
-
+	spin_lock(&iommu->lock);
 	domain->iommu_refcnt[iommu->seq_id] -= 1;
 	if (domain->iommu_refcnt[iommu->seq_id] == 0) {
 		num = domain->iommu_did[iommu->seq_id];
@@ -1827,6 +1825,7 @@ static void domain_detach_iommu(struct dmar_domain *domain,
 		domain_update_iommu_cap(domain);
 		domain->iommu_did[iommu->seq_id] = 0;
 	}
+	spin_unlock(&iommu->lock);
 }
 
 static inline int guestwidth_to_adjustwidth(int gaw)
@@ -2479,9 +2478,7 @@ static int domain_add_dev_info(struct dmar_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&device_domain_lock, flags);
 	info->domain = domain;
-	spin_lock(&iommu->lock);
 	ret = domain_attach_iommu(domain, iommu);
-	spin_unlock(&iommu->lock);
 	if (ret) {
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&device_domain_lock, flags);
 		return ret;
@@ -4166,7 +4163,6 @@ static void __dmar_remove_one_dev_info(struct device_domain_info *info)
 {
 	struct dmar_domain *domain;
 	struct intel_iommu *iommu;
-	unsigned long flags;
 
 	assert_spin_locked(&device_domain_lock);
 
@@ -4187,10 +4183,7 @@ static void __dmar_remove_one_dev_info(struct device_domain_info *info)
 	}
 
 	list_del(&info->link);
-
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&iommu->lock, flags);
 	domain_detach_iommu(domain, iommu);
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&iommu->lock, flags);
 }
 
 static void dmar_remove_one_dev_info(struct device *dev)
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-06-14  2:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-14  2:51 [PATCH v2 00/12] iommu/vt-d: Optimize the use of locks Lu Baolu
2022-06-14  2:51 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] iommu/vt-d: debugfs: Remove device_domain_lock usage Lu Baolu
2022-06-14  6:43   ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-14  7:15     ` Baolu Lu
2022-06-15  1:53     ` Baolu Lu
2022-06-15  6:13       ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-15 13:02         ` Baolu Lu
2022-06-14  2:51 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] iommu/vt-d: Remove for_each_device_domain() Lu Baolu
2022-06-14  2:51 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] iommu/vt-d: Remove clearing translation data in disable_dmar_iommu() Lu Baolu
2022-06-14  6:49   ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-14  7:21     ` Baolu Lu
2022-06-15  6:22       ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-15 13:10         ` Baolu Lu
2022-06-16  4:00           ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-14  2:51 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] iommu/vt-d: Use pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot() in pgtable_walk() Lu Baolu
2022-06-14  2:51 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] iommu/vt-d: Unnecessary spinlock for root table alloc and free Lu Baolu
2022-06-14  2:51 ` Lu Baolu [this message]
2022-06-14  6:52   ` [PATCH v2 06/12] iommu/vt-d: Acquiring lock in domain ID allocation helpers Tian, Kevin
2022-06-14  7:22     ` Baolu Lu
2022-06-14  2:51 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] iommu/vt-d: Acquiring lock in pasid manipulation helpers Lu Baolu
2022-06-14  2:51 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] iommu/vt-d: Replace spin_lock_irqsave() with spin_lock() Lu Baolu
2022-06-14  6:56   ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-14  2:51 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] iommu/vt-d: Check device list of domain in domain free path Lu Baolu
2022-06-14  6:57   ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-14  2:51 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] iommu/vt-d: Fold __dmar_remove_one_dev_info() into its caller Lu Baolu
2022-06-14  7:07   ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-14  7:44     ` Baolu Lu
2022-06-14  2:51 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] iommu/vt-d: Use device_domain_lock accurately Lu Baolu
2022-06-14  7:16   ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-14  7:47     ` Baolu Lu
2022-06-14  2:51 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] iommu/vt-d: Convert global spinlock into per domain ones Lu Baolu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220614025137.1632762-7-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jacob.jun.pan@intel.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).