linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>,
	Brent Rowsell <browsell@redhat.com>,
	Peter Hunt <pehunt@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/core: Use empty mask to reset cpumasks in sched_setaffinity()
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2023 11:37:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230705093752.GW4253@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5bc41342-5ba6-68e9-8315-9e5cef65d102@redhat.com>

On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 10:55:02AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:

> Our OpenShift team has actually hit a problem with the recent persistent
> user provided cpu affinity change because they are relying on the fact that
> moving a task to a different cpuset will reset cpu affinity to the cpuset
> default which is no longer true. That is the main reason behind this patch
> to provide a way to reset cpu affinity to the cpuset default.

Where is the sched_setaffinity() in that story?

So somewhere this thing did a sched_setaffinity() and then starts
playing with cpusets. Instead of adding more sched_setaffinity() calls,
can't it just remove some?



  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-05  9:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-28 21:16 [PATCH] sched/core: Use empty mask to reset cpumasks in sched_setaffinity() Waiman Long
2023-07-03 10:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-03 14:55   ` Waiman Long
2023-07-05  9:37     ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2023-07-05 14:07       ` Waiman Long
2023-07-17  7:43 ` kernel test robot
2023-07-17 14:41   ` [LTP] " Cyril Hrubis
2023-07-21  2:13     ` Waiman Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230705093752.GW4253@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=browsell@redhat.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pauld@redhat.com \
    --cc=pehunt@redhat.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).