linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Junyao Zhao <junzhao@redhat.com>,
	Chris von Recklinghausen <crecklin@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Nohz_full on boot CPU is broken (was: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] wq: Avoid using isolated cpus' timers on queue_delayed_work)
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 15:55:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240410135518.GA25421@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D0G5OX8W9NH9.1HE33RVAROAJK@gmail.com>

Hi Nicholas,

On 04/10, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>
> Thanks for this. Taking a while to page this back in, the intention is
> for housekeeping to be done by boot CPU until house keeper is awake, so
> returning smp_processor_id() seems like the right thing to do here for
> ephemeral jobs like timers and work, provided that CPU / mask is not
> stored somewhere long term by the caller.
>
> For things that set an affinity like kthread, sched, maybe managed
> irqs, and such.
>
> There are not many callers of housekeeping_any_cpu() so that's easy
> enough to verify. But similar like housekeeping_cpumask() and others
> could be an issue or at least a foot-gun, I'm not sure how well I
> convinced myself of those.
>
> Could you test like this?
>
>   WARN_ON_ONCE(system_state == SYSTEM_RUNNING ||
>                type != HK_TYPE_TIMER);
>
> With a comment to say other ephemeral mask types could be exempted if
> needed.

Sorry, I don't understand... Let me repeat, I know absolutely nothing
about nonhz/etc. I didn't even try to really fix the problem(s), I am
only trying to find a minimal/simple workaround to fix the problem we
hit in Red Hat.

This is what I was going to send:

	--- a/kernel/sched/isolation.c
	+++ b/kernel/sched/isolation.c
	@@ -46,7 +46,15 @@ int housekeeping_any_cpu(enum hk_type type)
				if (cpu < nr_cpu_ids)
					return cpu;
	 
	-			return cpumask_any_and(housekeeping.cpumasks[type], cpu_online_mask);
	+			cpu = cpumask_any_and(housekeeping.cpumasks[type], cpu_online_mask);
	+			if (likely(cpu < nr_cpu_ids))
	+				return cpu;
	+			/*
	+			 * Unless we have another problem this can only happen
	+			 * at boot time before start_secondary() brings the 1st
	+			 * housekeeping CPU up.
	+			 */
	+			WARN_ON_ONCE(system_state == SYSTEM_RUNNING);
			}
		}
		return smp_processor_id();

Yes, this fixes the symptom, not the problem. And yes, "another problem"
mentioned in the comment is very possible, say "maxcpus" kernel-parameter
can be less than the first housekeeping cpu. But in this case the user
should blame himself (and I am not sure the kernel will boot).

I don't understand why do you suggest to add "|| type != HK_TYPE_TIMER",
currently all the callers of housekeeping_any_cpu() use type == HK_TIMER.
But OK, I can add this check. I guess for the case it finds another user
with type != HK_TYPE_TIMER which can't use smp_processor_id() even at
boot time or stores the returned CPU for the long term.

Will you agree with the change above or what do you suggest instead as
a simple workaround?


> It would also be nice to warn for cases that would be bugs if the boot
> CPU was not in the HK mask. Could that be done by having a
> housekeepers_online() call after smp_init() (maybe at the start of
> sched_init_smp()) that could verify there is at least one online, and
> set a flag that could be used to create warnings.

Again, I am not sure I understand, but I too thought that something like

	housekeeping_check(void)
	{
		for_each_set_bit(type, &housekeeping.flags, HK_TYPE_MAX) {
			if (!cpumask_intersects(cpu_online, housekeeping.cpumasks[type]))
				panic();
		}

after bringup_nonboot_cpus(setup_max_cpus).

But I am not sure this is correct and this is another (although related) issue.

Oleg.


  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-10 13:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-30  1:00 [PATCH v2 1/1] wq: Avoid using isolated cpus' timers on queue_delayed_work Leonardo Bras
2024-01-30  1:22 ` Tejun Heo
2024-01-30  2:58   ` Leonardo Bras
2024-04-02 10:58 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-04-03 19:12   ` Tejun Heo
2024-04-03 20:38     ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-04-05 14:04       ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-04-05 15:38         ` Tejun Heo
2024-04-05 22:03           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-04-05 21:52         ` Nohz_full on boot CPU is broken (was: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] wq: Avoid using isolated cpus' timers on queue_delayed_work) Frederic Weisbecker
2024-04-07 13:09           ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-04-07 13:52             ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-04-09 12:05               ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-04-09 12:04             ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-04-09 13:07               ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-04-09 13:59                 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-04-10  4:26                 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-04-10 13:55                   ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2024-04-11 13:41                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-04-11 14:39   ` [PATCH] sched/isolation: fix boot crash when the boot CPU is nohz_full Oleg Nesterov
2024-04-11 16:59     ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-04-13 14:17     ` [PATCH] sched/isolation: fix boot crash when maxcpus < first-housekeeping-cpu Oleg Nesterov
2024-04-18 14:54       ` Phil Auld
2024-04-18 15:40       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-04-24 20:05       ` [tip: sched/urgent] sched/isolation: Fix boot crash when maxcpus < first housekeeping CPU tip-bot2 for Oleg Nesterov
2024-04-28  8:13         ` Ingo Molnar
2024-04-28 13:16           ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-04-28  8:24       ` tip-bot2 for Oleg Nesterov
2024-04-15 21:37     ` [PATCH] sched/isolation: fix boot crash when the boot CPU is nohz_full Frederic Weisbecker
2024-04-18 14:50     ` Phil Auld
2024-04-22 18:50       ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-04-24 14:42         ` Phil Auld
2024-04-24 20:05     ` [tip: sched/urgent] sched/isolation: {revent " tip-bot2 for Oleg Nesterov
2024-04-24 20:41       ` Phil Auld
2024-04-28  8:14         ` Ingo Molnar
2024-04-29 11:50           ` Phil Auld
2024-04-28  8:24     ` [tip: sched/urgent] sched/isolation: Prevent " tip-bot2 for Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240410135518.GA25421@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=crecklin@redhat.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=junzhao@redhat.com \
    --cc=leobras@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).