linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
Cc: "Richard Zhu" <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>,
	"Lucas Stach" <l.stach@pengutronix.de>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Shawn Guo" <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
	"Sascha Hauer" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	"Pengutronix Kernel Team" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	"Fabio Estevam" <festevam@gmail.com>,
	"NXP Linux Team" <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
	"Philipp Zabel" <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	"Liam Girdwood" <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	"Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/11] PCI: imx: Simplify switch-case logic by involve core_reset callback
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 15:49:50 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240427101950.GL1981@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240402-pci2_upstream-v3-7-803414bdb430@nxp.com>

On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 10:33:43AM -0400, Frank Li wrote:
> Instead of using the switch case statement to assert/dassert the core reset
> handled by this driver itself, let's introduce a new callback core_reset()
> and define it for platforms that require it. This simplifies the code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-imx.c | 131 ++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-imx.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-imx.c
> index 77dae5c3f7057..af0f960f28757 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-imx.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-imx.c
> @@ -104,6 +104,7 @@ struct imx_pcie_drvdata {
>  	const struct pci_epc_features *epc_features;
>  	int (*init_phy)(struct imx_pcie *pcie);
>  	int (*set_ref_clk)(struct imx_pcie *pcie, bool enable);
> +	int (*core_reset)(struct imx_pcie *pcie, bool assert);
>  };
>  
>  struct imx_pcie {
> @@ -671,35 +672,72 @@ static void imx_pcie_clk_disable(struct imx_pcie *imx_pcie)
>  	clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(imx_pcie->drvdata->clks_cnt, imx_pcie->clks);
>  }
>  
> +static int imx6sx_pcie_core_reset(struct imx_pcie *imx_pcie, bool assert)
> +{
> +	regmap_update_bits(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, IOMUXC_GPR12, IMX6SX_GPR12_PCIE_TEST_POWERDOWN,
> +			   assert ? IMX6SX_GPR12_PCIE_TEST_POWERDOWN : 0);

Earlier, this register was not cleared during deassert. Is if fine?

> +	/* Force PCIe PHY reset */
> +	regmap_update_bits(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, IOMUXC_GPR5, IMX6SX_GPR5_PCIE_BTNRST_RESET,
> +			   assert ? IMX6SX_GPR5_PCIE_BTNRST_RESET : 0);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int imx6qp_pcie_core_reset(struct imx_pcie *imx_pcie, bool assert)
> +{
> +	regmap_update_bits(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, IOMUXC_GPR1, IMX6Q_GPR1_PCIE_SW_RST,
> +			   assert ? IMX6Q_GPR1_PCIE_SW_RST : 0);
> +	if (!assert)
> +		usleep_range(200, 500);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int imx6q_pcie_core_reset(struct imx_pcie *imx_pcie, bool assert)
> +{
> +	regmap_update_bits(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, IOMUXC_GPR1, IMX6Q_GPR1_PCIE_TEST_PD,
> +			   assert ? IMX6Q_GPR1_PCIE_TEST_PD : 0);
> +
> +	regmap_update_bits(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, IOMUXC_GPR1, IMX6Q_GPR1_PCIE_REF_CLK_EN,
> +			   assert ? 0 : IMX6Q_GPR1_PCIE_REF_CLK_EN);
> +

Same comment as above.

> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int imx7d_pcie_core_reset(struct imx_pcie *imx_pcie, bool assert)
> +{
> +	struct dw_pcie *pci = imx_pcie->pci;
> +	struct device *dev = pci->dev;
> +
> +	if (assert)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Workaround for ERR010728, failure of PCI-e PLL VCO to oscillate, especially when cold.

What does 'especially when cold' means? I know it is an old comment, but still
it is not very clear.

> +	 * This turns off "Duty-cycle Corrector" and other mysterious undocumented things.

Same comment as previous patch.

> +	 */
> +
> +	if (likely(imx_pcie->phy_base)) {
> +		/* De-assert DCC_FB_EN */
> +		writel(PCIE_PHY_CMN_REG4_DCC_FB_EN, imx_pcie->phy_base + PCIE_PHY_CMN_REG4);
> +		/* Assert RX_EQS and RX_EQS_SEL */
> +		writel(PCIE_PHY_CMN_REG24_RX_EQ_SEL | PCIE_PHY_CMN_REG24_RX_EQ,
> +		       imx_pcie->phy_base + PCIE_PHY_CMN_REG24);
> +		/* Assert ATT_MODE */
> +		writel(PCIE_PHY_CMN_REG26_ATT_MODE, imx_pcie->phy_base + PCIE_PHY_CMN_REG26);

Why does this workaround a part of core_reset handling? This function doesn't
look like performing reset at all.

- Mani

> +	} else {
> +		dev_warn(dev, "Unable to apply ERR010728 workaround. DT missing fsl,imx7d-pcie-phy phandle ?\n");
> +	}
> +	imx7d_pcie_wait_for_phy_pll_lock(imx_pcie);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static void imx_pcie_assert_core_reset(struct imx_pcie *imx_pcie)
>  {
>  	reset_control_assert(imx_pcie->pciephy_reset);
>  	reset_control_assert(imx_pcie->apps_reset);
>  
> -	switch (imx_pcie->drvdata->variant) {
> -	case IMX6SX:
> -		regmap_update_bits(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, IOMUXC_GPR12,
> -				   IMX6SX_GPR12_PCIE_TEST_POWERDOWN,
> -				   IMX6SX_GPR12_PCIE_TEST_POWERDOWN);
> -		/* Force PCIe PHY reset */
> -		regmap_update_bits(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, IOMUXC_GPR5,
> -				   IMX6SX_GPR5_PCIE_BTNRST_RESET,
> -				   IMX6SX_GPR5_PCIE_BTNRST_RESET);
> -		break;
> -	case IMX6QP:
> -		regmap_update_bits(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, IOMUXC_GPR1,
> -				   IMX6Q_GPR1_PCIE_SW_RST,
> -				   IMX6Q_GPR1_PCIE_SW_RST);
> -		break;
> -	case IMX6Q:
> -		regmap_update_bits(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, IOMUXC_GPR1,
> -				   IMX6Q_GPR1_PCIE_TEST_PD, 1 << 18);
> -		regmap_update_bits(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, IOMUXC_GPR1,
> -				   IMX6Q_GPR1_PCIE_REF_CLK_EN, 0 << 16);
> -		break;
> -	default:
> -		break;
> -	}
> +	if (imx_pcie->drvdata->core_reset)
> +		imx_pcie->drvdata->core_reset(imx_pcie, true);
>  
>  	/* Some boards don't have PCIe reset GPIO. */
>  	if (gpio_is_valid(imx_pcie->reset_gpio))
> @@ -709,47 +747,10 @@ static void imx_pcie_assert_core_reset(struct imx_pcie *imx_pcie)
>  
>  static int imx_pcie_deassert_core_reset(struct imx_pcie *imx_pcie)
>  {
> -	struct dw_pcie *pci = imx_pcie->pci;
> -	struct device *dev = pci->dev;
> -
>  	reset_control_deassert(imx_pcie->pciephy_reset);
>  
> -	switch (imx_pcie->drvdata->variant) {
> -	case IMX7D:
> -		/* Workaround for ERR010728, failure of PCI-e PLL VCO to
> -		 * oscillate, especially when cold.  This turns off "Duty-cycle
> -		 * Corrector" and other mysterious undocumented things.
> -		 */
> -		if (likely(imx_pcie->phy_base)) {
> -			/* De-assert DCC_FB_EN */
> -			writel(PCIE_PHY_CMN_REG4_DCC_FB_EN,
> -			       imx_pcie->phy_base + PCIE_PHY_CMN_REG4);
> -			/* Assert RX_EQS and RX_EQS_SEL */
> -			writel(PCIE_PHY_CMN_REG24_RX_EQ_SEL
> -				| PCIE_PHY_CMN_REG24_RX_EQ,
> -			       imx_pcie->phy_base + PCIE_PHY_CMN_REG24);
> -			/* Assert ATT_MODE */
> -			writel(PCIE_PHY_CMN_REG26_ATT_MODE,
> -			       imx_pcie->phy_base + PCIE_PHY_CMN_REG26);
> -		} else {
> -			dev_warn(dev, "Unable to apply ERR010728 workaround. DT missing fsl,imx7d-pcie-phy phandle ?\n");
> -		}
> -
> -		imx7d_pcie_wait_for_phy_pll_lock(imx_pcie);
> -		break;
> -	case IMX6SX:
> -		regmap_update_bits(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, IOMUXC_GPR5,
> -				   IMX6SX_GPR5_PCIE_BTNRST_RESET, 0);
> -		break;
> -	case IMX6QP:
> -		regmap_update_bits(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, IOMUXC_GPR1,
> -				   IMX6Q_GPR1_PCIE_SW_RST, 0);
> -
> -		usleep_range(200, 500);
> -		break;
> -	default:
> -		break;
> -	}
> +	if (imx_pcie->drvdata->core_reset)
> +		imx_pcie->drvdata->core_reset(imx_pcie, false);
>  
>  	/* Some boards don't have PCIe reset GPIO. */
>  	if (gpio_is_valid(imx_pcie->reset_gpio)) {
> @@ -1447,6 +1448,7 @@ static const struct imx_pcie_drvdata drvdata[] = {
>  		.mode_mask[0] = IMX6Q_GPR12_DEVICE_TYPE,
>  		.init_phy = imx_pcie_init_phy,
>  		.set_ref_clk = imx6q_pcie_set_ref_clk,
> +		.core_reset = imx6q_pcie_core_reset,
>  	},
>  	[IMX6SX] = {
>  		.variant = IMX6SX,
> @@ -1462,6 +1464,7 @@ static const struct imx_pcie_drvdata drvdata[] = {
>  		.mode_mask[0] = IMX6Q_GPR12_DEVICE_TYPE,
>  		.init_phy = imx6sx_pcie_init_phy,
>  		.set_ref_clk = imx6sx_pcie_set_ref_clk,
> +		.core_reset = imx6sx_pcie_core_reset,
>  	},
>  	[IMX6QP] = {
>  		.variant = IMX6QP,
> @@ -1478,6 +1481,7 @@ static const struct imx_pcie_drvdata drvdata[] = {
>  		.mode_mask[0] = IMX6Q_GPR12_DEVICE_TYPE,
>  		.init_phy = imx_pcie_init_phy,
>  		.set_ref_clk = imx6q_pcie_set_ref_clk,
> +		.core_reset = imx6qp_pcie_core_reset,
>  	},
>  	[IMX7D] = {
>  		.variant = IMX7D,
> @@ -1491,6 +1495,7 @@ static const struct imx_pcie_drvdata drvdata[] = {
>  		.mode_mask[0] = IMX6Q_GPR12_DEVICE_TYPE,
>  		.init_phy = imx7d_pcie_init_phy,
>  		.set_ref_clk = imx7d_pcie_set_ref_clk,
> +		.core_reset = imx7d_pcie_core_reset,
>  	},
>  	[IMX8MQ] = {
>  		.variant = IMX8MQ,
> 
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-27 10:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-02 14:33 [PATCH v3 00/11] PCI: imx6: Fix\rename\clean up and add lut information for imx95 Frank Li
2024-04-02 14:33 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] PCI: imx6: Fix PCIe link down when i.MX8MM and i.MX8MP PCIe is EP mode Frank Li
2024-04-27  9:00   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-04-29 14:53     ` Frank Li
2024-04-02 14:33 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] PCI: imx6: Fix i.MX8MP PCIe EP can not trigger MSI Frank Li
2024-04-27  9:23   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-04-29 15:58     ` Frank Li
2024-04-02 14:33 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] PCI: imx6: Rename imx6_* with imx_* Frank Li
2024-04-27  9:29   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-04-02 14:33 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] PCI: imx6: Rename pci-imx6.c to pcie-imx.c Frank Li
2024-04-27  9:31   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-04-29 16:01     ` Frank Li
2024-04-02 14:33 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] MAINTAINERS: pci: imx: update imx6* to imx* since rename driver file Frank Li
2024-04-27  9:33   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-04-29 15:03   ` Rob Herring
2024-04-02 14:33 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] PCI: imx: Simplify switch-case logic by involve set_ref_clk callback Frank Li
2024-04-27  9:54   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-04-02 14:33 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] PCI: imx: Simplify switch-case logic by involve core_reset callback Frank Li
2024-04-27 10:19   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2024-04-29 16:38     ` Frank Li
2024-04-02 14:33 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] PCI: imx: Config look up table(LUT) to support MSI ITS and IOMMU for i.MX95 Frank Li
2024-04-27 11:36   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-04-29 15:06     ` Rob Herring
2024-04-29 17:00     ` Frank Li
2024-04-29 15:08   ` Rob Herring
2024-04-02 14:33 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] PCI: imx: Consolidate redundant if-checks Frank Li
2024-04-27 11:38   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-04-02 14:33 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] dt-bindings: imx6q-pcie: Add i.MX8Q pcie compatible string Frank Li
2024-04-29 15:48   ` Rob Herring
2024-04-29 21:23     ` Frank Li
2024-05-07 14:55       ` Rob Herring
2024-04-02 14:33 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] PCI: imx6: Add i.MX8Q PCIe support Frank Li
2024-04-27 11:47   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-04-29 17:56     ` Frank Li
2024-04-16 14:07 ` [PATCH v3 00/11] PCI: imx6: Fix\rename\clean up and add lut information for imx95 Frank Li
2024-04-25 11:12   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-04-23 14:23 ` Frank Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240427101950.GL1981@thinkpad \
    --to=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=hongxing.zhu@nxp.com \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).