From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932182AbeDCMlW (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Apr 2018 08:41:22 -0400 Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com ([66.187.233.73]:55700 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932087AbeDCMlV (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Apr 2018 08:41:21 -0400 Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20180403154122.00d76d61@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20180403154122.00d76d61@canb.auug.org.au> To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , David Miller , Networking , Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <29193.1522759279.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2018 13:41:19 +0100 Message-ID: <29194.1522759279@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Stephen Rothwell wrote: > + wait_var_event(&rxnet->nr_calls, !atomic_read(&rxnet->nr_calls)); I would prefer == 0 to ! as it's not really a true/false value. But apart from that, it's looks okay and you can add my Reviewed-by. David