From: Saurav Girepunje <saurav.girepunje@gmail.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: saurav.girepunje@hotmail.com, Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net,
phil@philpotter.co.uk, straube.linux@gmail.com, martin@kaiser.cx,
linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: r8188eu: os_dep: simplifiy the rtw_resume function
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2021 17:34:29 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <30ae6751-3b44-7779-4eae-14d0ed7a75c6@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YTNFHd6o0f9rAMO2@kroah.com>
On 04/09/21 3:36 pm, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 04, 2021 at 03:09:13PM +0530, Saurav Girepunje wrote:
>> Remove unused variable ret and pwrpriv.
>> Remove the condition with no effect (if == else) in usb_intf.c
>> file.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Saurav Girepunje <saurav.girepunje@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/staging/r8188eu/os_dep/usb_intf.c | 8 +-------
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/os_dep/usb_intf.c b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/os_dep/usb_intf.c
>> index bb85ab77fd26..673cd3001183 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/os_dep/usb_intf.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/os_dep/usb_intf.c
>> @@ -493,14 +493,8 @@ static int rtw_resume(struct usb_interface *pusb_intf)
>> {
>> struct dvobj_priv *dvobj = usb_get_intfdata(pusb_intf);
>> struct adapter *padapter = dvobj->if1;
>> - struct pwrctrl_priv *pwrpriv = &padapter->pwrctrlpriv;
>> - int ret = 0;
>>
>> - if (pwrpriv->bInternalAutoSuspend)
>> - ret = rtw_resume_process(padapter);
>> - else
>> - ret = rtw_resume_process(padapter);
>> - return ret;
>> + return rtw_resume_process(padapter);
>> }
>>
>> int rtw_resume_process(struct adapter *padapter)
>
> Why not just delete the rtw_resume_process() declaration line and make
> the rtw_resume() function be the whole thing, as rtw_resume_process() is
> never called anywhere else. That would be even more lines of code
> removed and simplified here.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Yes, rtw_resume_process function can be removed .
Thanks for review greg.
Regards,
Saurav Girepunje
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-04 12:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-04 9:39 [PATCH] staging: r8188eu: os_dep: simplifiy the rtw_resume function Saurav Girepunje
2021-09-04 10:06 ` Greg KH
2021-09-04 12:04 ` Saurav Girepunje [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=30ae6751-3b44-7779-4eae-14d0ed7a75c6@gmail.com \
--to=saurav.girepunje@gmail.com \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=martin@kaiser.cx \
--cc=phil@philpotter.co.uk \
--cc=saurav.girepunje@hotmail.com \
--cc=straube.linux@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).