From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F03C9C433DF for ; Wed, 27 May 2020 07:20:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C054C20E65 for ; Wed, 27 May 2020 07:20:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1590564049; bh=xe0XCZfpz88ojVoEgE66/wE6fHWWqAyThRQDs0+/Qqs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=eXeLN2UGTxyq8N1V8mgItsW/2TiB0dpc0doN+A1+2pDQES/3MisTFnL4WT+C88S6e cvP7tfxTQsXRXYewsaUp8T010yA7x3ODrgx9rDaBGrLR7PQvGOZTvKEXY+ALTmgZHf wzKqJyWnt0pfa7Sz6onazi8nuZFd3yH9TD4+KMb8= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729084AbgE0HUt (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 May 2020 03:20:49 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:43750 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728303AbgE0HUs (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 May 2020 03:20:48 -0400 Received: from disco-boy.misterjones.org (disco-boy.misterjones.org [51.254.78.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7A6AF20C56; Wed, 27 May 2020 07:20:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1590564047; bh=xe0XCZfpz88ojVoEgE66/wE6fHWWqAyThRQDs0+/Qqs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=WABS5Dro923F6hOOT4JBJX+vEWtTfPyhmyPMpL17+pe7WBLFPyN1uqVWT8Yn2Efr9 DBxfD2NPeacMwXgyDSaPXEiU3Hu3ZK2XxKea8S1z3IvQOKtyQtZm3BNal+JZ+UjWof n4fDU940Js3kYZ7JYZ7CjmuUcxWBu3JqG9D+mJQQ= Received: from disco-boy.misterjones.org ([51.254.78.96] helo=www.loen.fr) by disco-boy.misterjones.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jdqMn-00Fcxl-OC; Wed, 27 May 2020 08:20:45 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 08:20:45 +0100 From: Marc Zyngier To: Gavin Shan Cc: Mark Rutland , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, will@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, drjones@redhat.com, eric.auger@redhat.com, aarcange@redhat.com, shan.gavin@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH RFCv2 3/9] kvm/arm64: Rename kvm_vcpu_get_hsr() to kvm_vcpu_get_esr() In-Reply-To: <2e4dd03f-656a-c32b-5e87-ca28583999ef@redhat.com> References: <20200508032919.52147-1-gshan@redhat.com> <20200508032919.52147-4-gshan@redhat.com> <20200526104249.GB1363@C02TD0UTHF1T.local> <2e4dd03f-656a-c32b-5e87-ca28583999ef@redhat.com> User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4.4 Message-ID: <359dad5546a428ea963781f2728e70bf@kernel.org> X-Sender: maz@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 51.254.78.96 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: gshan@redhat.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, will@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, drjones@redhat.com, eric.auger@redhat.com, aarcange@redhat.com, shan.gavin@gmail.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: maz@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on disco-boy.misterjones.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2020-05-27 03:43, Gavin Shan wrote: > Hi Mark, > > On 5/26/20 8:42 PM, Mark Rutland wrote: >> On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 01:29:13PM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote: >>> Since kvm/arm32 was removed, this renames kvm_vcpu_get_hsr() to >>> kvm_vcpu_get_esr() to it a bit more self-explaining because the >>> functions returns ESR instead of HSR on aarch64. This shouldn't >>> cause any functional changes. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan >> >> I think that this would be a nice cleanup on its own, and could be >> taken >> independently of the rest of this series if it were rebased and sent >> as >> a single patch. >> > > Yeah, I'll see how PATCH[3,4,5] can be posted independently > as part of the preparatory work, which is suggested by you > in another reply. > > By the way, I assume the cleanup patches are good enough to > target 5.8.rc1/rc2 if you agree. It's fine to base them on -rc1 or -rc2. They will not be merged before 5.9 though. Thanks, M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...