From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Keqian Zhu <zhukeqian1@huawei.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
Yi Sun <yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com>,
Tian Kevin <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Cc: baolu.lu@linux.intel.com,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com, jiangkunkun@huawei.com,
yuzenghui@huawei.com, lushenming@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 01/13] iommu: Introduce dirty log tracking framework
Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 11:20:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <36cc7267-6aa3-db54-b08c-c2dfc0bbacb6@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <60182a35-e151-7150-3708-4e58dd8e78da@huawei.com>
On 5/11/21 3:40 PM, Keqian Zhu wrote:
>> For upper layers, before starting page tracking, they check the
>> dirty_page_trackable attribution of the domain and start it only it's
>> capable. Once the page tracking is switched on the vendor iommu driver
>> (or iommu core) should block further device attach/detach operations
>> until page tracking is stopped.
> But when a domain becomes capable after detaching a device, the upper layer
> still needs to query it and enable dirty log for it...
>
> To make things coordinated, maybe the upper layer can register a notifier,
> when the domain's capability change, the upper layer do not need to query, instead
> they just need to realize a callback, and do their specific policy in the callback.
> What do you think?
>
That might be an option. But why not checking domain's attribution every
time a new tracking period is about to start?
Best regards,
baolu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-12 4:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-07 10:21 [RFC PATCH v4 00/13] iommu/smmuv3: Implement hardware dirty log tracking Keqian Zhu
2021-05-07 10:21 ` [RFC PATCH v4 01/13] iommu: Introduce dirty log tracking framework Keqian Zhu
2021-05-08 3:46 ` Lu Baolu
2021-05-08 7:35 ` Keqian Zhu
2021-05-10 1:08 ` Lu Baolu
2021-05-10 11:07 ` Keqian Zhu
2021-05-11 3:12 ` Lu Baolu
2021-05-11 7:40 ` Keqian Zhu
2021-05-12 3:20 ` Lu Baolu [this message]
2021-05-12 8:44 ` Keqian Zhu
2021-05-12 11:36 ` Lu Baolu
2021-05-13 10:58 ` Keqian Zhu
2021-05-13 12:02 ` Lu Baolu
2021-05-14 2:30 ` Keqian Zhu
2021-05-07 10:22 ` [RFC PATCH v4 02/13] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Add quirk ARM_HD and ARM_BBMLx Keqian Zhu
2021-05-07 10:22 ` [RFC PATCH v4 03/13] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Add and realize split_block ops Keqian Zhu
2021-05-07 10:22 ` [RFC PATCH v4 04/13] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Add and realize merge_page ops Keqian Zhu
2021-05-07 10:22 ` [RFC PATCH v4 05/13] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Add and realize sync_dirty_log ops Keqian Zhu
2021-05-07 10:22 ` [RFC PATCH v4 06/13] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Add and realize clear_dirty_log ops Keqian Zhu
2021-05-07 10:22 ` [RFC PATCH v4 07/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add support for Hardware Translation Table Update Keqian Zhu
2021-05-07 10:22 ` [RFC PATCH v4 08/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Enable HTTU for stage1 with io-pgtable mapping Keqian Zhu
2021-05-07 10:22 ` [RFC PATCH v4 09/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add feature detection for BBML Keqian Zhu
2021-05-07 10:22 ` [RFC PATCH v4 10/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Realize switch_dirty_log iommu ops Keqian Zhu
2021-05-07 10:22 ` [RFC PATCH v4 11/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Realize sync_dirty_log " Keqian Zhu
2021-05-07 10:22 ` [RFC PATCH v4 12/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Realize clear_dirty_log " Keqian Zhu
2021-05-07 10:22 ` [RFC PATCH v4 13/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Realize support_dirty_log " Keqian Zhu
2021-05-17 8:46 ` [RFC PATCH v4 00/13] iommu/smmuv3: Implement hardware dirty log tracking Keqian Zhu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=36cc7267-6aa3-db54-b08c-c2dfc0bbacb6@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=jiangkunkun@huawei.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lushenming@huawei.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
--cc=zhukeqian1@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).