From: Russell Leighton <russell.leighton@247media.com>
To: Michael Rothwell <rothwell@holly-springs.nc.us>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Coroutines [was Re: threading question]
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 17:30:55 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B2BD00F.E8CEBF0B@247media.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E15BHrC-0008Ba-00@the-village.bc.nu> <3B2BA68D.984A2808@247media.com> <992718405.913.0.camel@gromit>
Any chance this or the equiv could become part of glibc?
This seems a very handy abstraction, in many apps
threads would then really only be needed for true parallelism.
Michael Rothwell wrote:
> Try this:
>
> http://lecker.essen.de/~froese/coro/
>
> -M
>
> On 16 Jun 2001 14:33:50 -0400, Russell Leighton wrote:
> >
> > Is there a user-space implemenation (library?) for coroutines that would work from C?
> >
> >
> > Alan Cox wrote:
> >
> > > > Can you provide any info and/or examples of co-routines? I'm curious to
> > > > see a good example of co-routines' "betterness."
> > >
> > > With co-routines you don't need
> > >
> > > 8K of kernel stack
> > > Scheduler overhead
> > > Fancy locking
> > >
> > > You don't get the automatic thread switching stuff though.
> > >
> > > So you might get code that reads like this (note that aio_ stuff works rather
> > > well combined with co-routines as it fixes a lack of asynchronicity in the
> > > unix disk I/O world)
> > >
> > > select(....)
> > >
> > > if(FD_ISSET(copier_fd))
> > > run_coroutine(&copier_state);
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > and the copier might be something like
> > >
> > > while(1)
> > > {
> > > // Yes 1 at a time is dumb but this is an example..
> > > // Yes Im ignoring EOF for this
> > > if(read(copier_fd, buf[bufptr], 1)==-1)
> > > {
> > > if(errno==-EWOULDBLOCK)
> > > {
> > > coroutine_return();
> > > continue;
> > > }
> > > }
> > > if(bufptr==255 || buf[bufptr]=='\n')
> > > {
> > > run_coroutine(run_command, buf);
> > > bufptr=0;
> > > }
> > > else
> > > bufptr++;
> > > }
> > >
> > > it lets you express a state machine as a set of multiple such small state
> > > machines instead. run_coroutine() will continue a routine where it last
> > > coroutine_return()'d from. Thus in the above case we are expressing read
> > > bytes until you see a new line cleanly - not mangled in with keeping state
> > > in global structures but by using natural C local variables and code flow
> > >
> > > Alan
> > >
> > > -
> > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> >
> > --
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> > Russell Leighton russell.leighton@247media.com
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> --
> Michael Rothwell
> rothwell@holly-springs.nc.us
--
---------------------------------------------------
Russell Leighton russell.leighton@247media.com
---------------------------------------------------
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-06-16 21:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-06-12 18:24 threading question ognen
2001-06-12 18:39 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-06-12 18:57 ` from dmesg: kernel BUG at inode.c:486 Olivier Sessink
2001-06-12 18:58 ` threading question Christoph Hellwig
2001-06-12 19:07 ` ognen
2001-06-12 19:15 ` Kip Macy
2001-06-12 19:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2001-06-12 19:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2001-06-13 12:20 ` Kurt Garloff
2001-06-13 13:35 ` J . A . Magallon
2001-06-13 14:17 ` Philips
2001-06-13 15:06 ` ognen
2001-06-12 21:44 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-06-12 21:48 ` ognen
2001-06-14 18:15 ` Alan Cox
2001-06-14 22:42 ` threading question (results after thread pooling) ognen
2001-06-14 23:00 ` Mike Castle
2001-06-12 21:58 ` threading question Albert D. Cahalan
2001-06-12 23:48 ` J . A . Magallon
2001-06-12 19:06 ` Kip Macy
2001-06-12 19:14 ` Alexander Viro
2001-06-12 19:25 ` Russell Leighton
2001-06-12 23:27 ` Mike Castle
2001-06-13 17:31 ` bert hubert
2001-06-14 6:45 ` Helge Hafting
2001-06-14 18:28 ` Alan Cox
2001-06-14 19:01 ` bert hubert
2001-06-14 19:22 ` Russell Leighton
2001-06-15 11:29 ` Anil Kumar
2001-06-14 23:05 ` J . A . Magallon
2001-06-16 14:16 ` Michael Rothwell
2001-06-16 15:19 ` Alan Cox
2001-06-16 18:33 ` Russell Leighton
2001-06-16 19:06 ` Michael Rothwell
2001-06-16 21:30 ` Russell Leighton [this message]
2001-06-12 22:41 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3B2BD00F.E8CEBF0B@247media.com \
--to=russell.leighton@247media.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rothwell@holly-springs.nc.us \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).