From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>,
rddunlap@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: The magical mystical changing ethernet interface order
Date: Wed, 07 May 2003 15:28:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3EB98878.5060607@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20030507150414.1eaeae75.akpm@digeo.com
Andrew Morton wrote:
> Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
>>A wild stab in the dark, I'd think maybe the init ordering changed:
>
> Well stabbed. The relative ordering of tulip and ne2k in
> drivers/net/Makefile got changed.
>
> Maybe we should reorganise the 2.5 Makefile to copy the 2.4 Makefile's
> ordering. How pleasant.
>
> I suspect the linker is at liberty to reorder these anyway.
The linker will order things in the final object in the order that you
passed them. We depend on this for getting __init functions run in the
right order:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=linux.kernel.27361.1016068035%40kao2.melbourne.sgi.com
--
Dave Hansen
haveblue@us.ibm.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-07 22:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-07 13:14 The magical mystical changing ethernet interface order Russell King
2003-05-07 15:18 ` Dick Streefland
2003-05-07 15:38 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-05-07 15:24 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-05-07 17:14 ` Russell King
2003-05-07 22:04 ` Andrew Morton
2003-05-07 22:28 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2003-05-08 12:05 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-08 14:55 ` Alan Cox
2003-05-08 14:54 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-08 16:24 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-05-08 16:26 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-05-08 16:30 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-05-11 18:41 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-05-08 17:56 ` Kai Germaschewski
2003-05-08 17:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-05-09 6:51 ` Richard Henderson
2003-05-08 19:32 Jean Tourrilhes
2003-05-08 21:43 ` Eli Carter
2003-05-08 22:19 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2003-05-08 21:46 ` Alan Cox
2003-05-08 23:23 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-05-08 23:38 Ray Lee
2003-05-09 12:41 ` Dick Streefland
2003-05-09 14:33 ` Mr. James W. Laferriere
2003-05-10 7:42 Thomas Hood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3EB98878.5060607@us.ibm.com \
--to=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rddunlap@osdl.org \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).