linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Samuel Flory <sflory@rackable.com>
To: Steven Dake <sdake@mvista.com>
Cc: Chad Kitching <CKitching@powerlandcomputers.com>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, andre@linux-ide.org,
	frankt@promise.com
Subject: Re: IDE/Promise 20276 FastTrack RAID Doesn't work in 2.4.21, patchattached to fix
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 15:51:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F0DEDFD.5040805@rackable.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3F0DE8CF.9060808@mvista.com>

Steven Dake wrote:

> Even with special fasttrack feature enabled, my disk devices on the 
> PDC20276 is not found.  There is code in pci-setup.c which blocks 
> other PDC controllers, why not the 20276?  Is that code for some other 
> purpose, or orthagonal to the force option?

  The comments would seem to indicate that this is only needed if you 
have a second controller.  Which leads me to wonder what if I have 3 or 
4 pdc controllers.

        for (port = 0; port <= 1; ++port) {
                ide_pci_enablebit_t *e = &(d->enablebits[port]);

                /*
                 * If this is a Promise FakeRaid controller,
                 * the 2nd controller will be marked as
                 * disabled while it is actually there and enabled
                 * by the bios for raid purposes.
                 * Skip the normal "is it enabled" test for those.
                 */
                if (((d->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_PROMISE) &&
                     ((d->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_PROMISE_20262) ||
                      (d->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_PROMISE_20265))) &&
                    (secondpdc++==1) && (port==1))
                        goto controller_ok;






-- 
Once you have their hardware. Never give it back.
(The First Rule of Hardware Acquisition)
Sam Flory  <sflory@rackable.com>



  reply	other threads:[~2003-07-10 22:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-10 22:05 IDE/Promise 20276 FastTrack RAID Doesn't work in 2.4.21, patchattached to fix Chad Kitching
2003-07-10 22:18 ` Samuel Flory
2003-07-10 22:29   ` Steven Dake
2003-07-10 22:51     ` Samuel Flory [this message]
2003-07-10 23:13       ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-07-10 23:57         ` Steven Dake
2003-07-10 23:24       ` Steven Dake
2003-07-10 23:43         ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-07-10 23:54           ` Samuel Flory
2003-07-11  0:18             ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-07-10 22:55 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-07-10 23:04   ` Samuel Flory
2003-07-12 15:11     ` Ruth Ivimey-Cook
2003-07-12 16:14       ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-07-12 17:01         ` Ruth Ivimey-Cook
2003-07-14 17:31           ` Samuel Flory
2003-07-14 18:49             ` Alan Cox
2003-07-12 18:36 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3F0DEDFD.5040805@rackable.com \
    --to=sflory@rackable.com \
    --cc=B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl \
    --cc=CKitching@powerlandcomputers.com \
    --cc=andre@linux-ide.org \
    --cc=frankt@promise.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sdake@mvista.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).