From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761856AbcKDLT5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Nov 2016 07:19:57 -0400 Received: from gloria.sntech.de ([95.129.55.99]:52178 "EHLO gloria.sntech.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755328AbcKDLT4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Nov 2016 07:19:56 -0400 From: Heiko Stuebner To: Jaehoon Chung Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, ulf.hansson@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, shawn.lin@rock-chips.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/13] ARM: dts: exynos: replace to "max-frequecy" instead of "clock-freq-min-max" Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2016 12:19:49 +0100 Message-ID: <4066252.a1W9ejEKHX@phil> User-Agent: KMail/5.2.3 (Linux/4.7.0-1-amd64; KDE/5.26.0; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <20161103062135.10697-1-jh80.chung@samsung.com> <20161103184112.GB11071@kozik-lap> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Jaehoon, Am Freitag, 4. November 2016, 19:21:30 CET schrieb Jaehoon Chung: > On 11/04/2016 03:41 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 03:21:32PM +0900, Jaehoon Chung wrote: > >> In drivers/mmc/core/host.c, there is "max-frequency" property. > >> It should be same behavior. So Use the "max-frequency" instead of > >> "clock-freq-min-max". > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung > >> --- > >> > >> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-artik5-eval.dts | 2 +- > >> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-artik5.dtsi | 2 +- > >> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-monk.dts | 2 +- > >> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-rinato.dts | 2 +- > >> 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > This looks totally independent to rest of patches so it can be applied > > separately without any functional impact (except lack of minimum > > frequency). Is that correct? > > You're right. I will split the patches. And will resend. > Thanks! I think what Krzysztof was asking was just if he can simply pick up this patch alone, as it does not require any of the previous changes. Same is true for the Rockchip patches I guess, so we could just take them individually into samsung/rockchip dts branches. Heiko