From: Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add cpu OPP tables
Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 15:41:23 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <418a64429a9f0b3138a72b9321e832dd@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAD=FV=Vng40b05F2_i7qqXC+yN=ZBgRXsio-86sBA+QdoMMGaw@mail.gmail.com>
Hey Doug,
Thanks for the review!
On 2021-05-05 01:32, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 11:59 PM Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>
> wrote:
>>
>> + cpu0_opp_table: cpu0_opp_table {
>> + compatible = "operating-points-v2";
>> + opp-shared;
>> +
>> + cpu0_opp1: opp-300000000 {
>
> It seems like it might be nicer to give the node labels a less
> arbitrary name. How about?
>
> cpu0_opp_300mhz: opp-300000000
>
> That has advantes:
>
> * If, for some reason, you have to mess with some operating point in
> another dts it'll be less fragile.
>
> * It'll make diffing easier between SoCs.
>
> * If you end up putting a new operating point in the middle you don't
> need to rename everything below.
sure makes sense, will fix it in v3.
>
> Other than that, I can't say that I'm a huge expert on the
> interconnect stuff and whether those make sense, but I'm still OK
> with:
>
> Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-05 10:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-04 6:58 [PATCH v2 0/2] DDR/L3 Scaling support on SC7280 SoCs Sibi Sankar
2021-05-04 6:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] cpufreq: blacklist SC7280 in cpufreq-dt-platdev Sibi Sankar
2021-05-04 19:47 ` Doug Anderson
2021-05-04 6:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add cpu OPP tables Sibi Sankar
2021-05-04 20:02 ` Doug Anderson
2021-05-05 10:11 ` Sibi Sankar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=418a64429a9f0b3138a72b9321e832dd@codeaurora.org \
--to=sibis@codeaurora.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mka@chromium.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).