From: Stephen Clark <Stephen.Clark@seclark.us>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Cc: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [git patches] libata updates
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 16:22:18 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46364FFA.9050500@seclark.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46364C04.4050208@garzik.org>
Jeff Garzik wrote:
>Chuck Ebbert wrote:
>
>
>>Jeff Garzik wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Jeff Garzik (8):
>>> libata/IDE: remove combined mode quirk
>>>
>>>
>>You can't just remove the "combined_mode=" kernel parameter or
>>every Linux user who uses that will get an unbootable kernel
>>with no good way of diagnosing the problem. It should still
>>be accepted and just print a warning.
>>
>>
>
>No, most modern distros will simply Just Work(tm) due to mount by label,
>udev, and similar gadgets.
>
>As long as you have at least one (if not both) ATA drivers, you have a
>kernel that will boot your hardware. And by definition those using
>combined_mode= do indeed have the necessary drivers.
>
> Jeff
>
>
>
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>
>
Please don't do this!
Yeah the kernel will boot but the hd performance is sh*t on my laptop. I
am running FC6 with
kernel 2.6.21 and without the combined_mode setting my disk performance
goes down to a
whopping 1.25mb/sec from 44mb/sec when I boot with combined_mode=libata.
It make my
system unusable!
Regards,
Steve
--
"They that give up essential liberty to obtain temporary safety,
deserve neither liberty nor safety." (Ben Franklin)
"The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty
decreases." (Thomas Jefferson)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-30 20:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 95+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-29 16:15 [git patches] libata updates Jeff Garzik
2007-04-30 19:52 ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-04-30 20:05 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-04-30 20:22 ` Stephen Clark [this message]
2007-04-30 20:31 ` Alan Cox
2007-04-30 20:51 ` alan
2007-04-30 20:31 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-05-01 11:55 ` Stephen Clark
2007-05-01 21:38 ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-01 22:45 ` Stephen Clark
2007-05-01 22:49 ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-01 22:49 ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-05-02 0:48 ` Stephen Clark
2007-04-30 22:06 ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-04-30 22:11 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-05-01 21:34 ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-10 0:18 ` Jeff Garzik
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-04-30 22:26 Jeff Garzik
2013-04-30 23:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-07-25 20:35 Jeff Garzik
2012-07-25 20:43 ` Jeff Garzik
2012-07-25 22:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-07-25 22:26 ` Jeff Garzik
2012-07-25 22:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-07-25 22:58 ` Jeff Garzik
2012-07-25 23:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-07-26 2:10 ` Jeff Garzik
2012-07-26 17:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-07-26 7:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-07-25 21:38 ` Jeff Garzik
2012-07-26 4:47 ` Aaron Lu
2012-07-26 5:05 ` James Bottomley
2012-07-26 5:17 ` Aaron Lu
2012-07-26 14:58 ` Alan Stern
2011-01-28 8:29 Jeff Garzik
2010-08-04 1:55 Jeff Garzik
2010-08-04 18:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-08-04 18:46 ` Jeff Garzik
2010-06-02 18:08 Jeff Garzik
2010-05-28 1:18 Jeff Garzik
2009-12-19 18:13 Jeff Garzik
2009-12-19 19:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-19 20:11 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-09-17 20:49 Jeff Garzik
2009-09-20 21:05 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-09-22 2:36 ` Jung-Ik (John) Lee
2009-09-28 15:34 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-09-28 20:20 ` Jung-Ik (John) Lee
2009-09-28 20:36 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-09-28 20:49 ` Jung-Ik (John) Lee
2009-10-06 4:24 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-10-06 22:26 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-10-06 23:02 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-06-23 6:06 Jeff Garzik
2009-04-07 1:42 Jeff Garzik
2009-03-25 3:01 Jeff Garzik
2009-02-03 4:27 Jeff Garzik
2009-01-08 21:46 Jeff Garzik
2008-10-28 4:45 Jeff Garzik
2008-08-22 7:04 Jeff Garzik
2008-07-31 6:51 Jeff Garzik
2008-05-19 22:57 Jeff Garzik
2008-05-06 15:48 Jeff Garzik
2008-05-06 16:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-29 6:25 Jeff Garzik
2008-02-25 22:38 Jeff Garzik
2008-02-06 12:14 Jeff Garzik
2008-02-01 18:33 Jeff Garzik
2008-01-25 23:16 Jeff Garzik
2007-10-25 7:49 Jeff Garzik
2007-10-15 20:20 Jeff Garzik
2007-07-20 15:00 Jeff Garzik
2007-07-12 20:20 Jeff Garzik
2007-07-10 18:36 Jeff Garzik
2007-05-11 22:32 Jeff Garzik
2006-12-14 23:08 Jeff Garzik
2006-12-15 1:14 ` Alan
2006-12-07 12:40 Jeff Garzik
2006-10-04 6:02 Jeff Garzik
2006-10-04 11:47 ` Alan Cox
2006-10-04 14:34 ` Alan Cox
[not found] <20060924162850.GA14323@havoc.gtf.org>
2006-09-24 16:33 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-03-30 22:01 Jeff Garzik
2006-03-24 15:59 Jeff Garzik
2006-03-23 1:15 Jeff Garzik
2006-03-23 1:36 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-03-20 11:16 Jeff Garzik
2006-03-20 16:35 ` Alan Cox
2006-03-21 1:12 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-03-21 10:20 ` Alan Cox
2006-03-21 16:40 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-03-21 17:23 ` Alan Cox
2006-02-01 4:14 Jeff Garzik
2005-09-23 23:11 Jeff Garzik
2005-09-07 6:10 Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46364FFA.9050500@seclark.us \
--to=stephen.clark@seclark.us \
--cc=cebbert@redhat.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).