linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
	Mikko Perttunen <cyndis@kapsi.fi>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	bskeggs@redhat.com, Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	kwizart@gmail.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Linux IOMMU <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/6] Resolve unwanted DMA backing with IOMMU
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 23:02:01 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4850389.K9ByBxYttl@dimapc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180727183134.GD6738@8bytes.org>

On Friday, 27 July 2018 21:31:34 MSK Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 11:13:31AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > I don't follow why we need a property rather than being implied by the
> > device's (the GPU) compatible string.
> 
> There might be devices where either setup works, with or without IOMMU
> translation, and the firmware can set the property depending on whether
> the user wants more performance or more security.
> 
> If we have a whitelist in the kernel this gets more complicated, we
> probably need additional kernel-parameters to overwrite those whitelist
> entries. Having a property in the device-tree seems to be a better way
> here, imho.

IIUC, device-tree should be considered to be "written in stone" for a consumer 
device and hence firmware property isn't something that could be easily 
changed. The kernel-parameter will be much more universal. Anyway the global 
whitelisting should be a different topic for discussion, right now we need a 
kind of private whitelisting that is internal to kernel.




  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-27 20:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-26 23:16 [RFC PATCH v1 0/6] Resolve unwanted DMA backing with IOMMU Dmitry Osipenko
2018-07-26 23:16 ` [RFC PATCH v1 1/6] driver core: Add option for disabling of backing devices DMA " Dmitry Osipenko
2018-07-26 23:16 ` [RFC PATCH v1 2/6] of/device: Don't back devices DMA with IOMMU if that's undesired by driver Dmitry Osipenko
2018-07-26 23:16 ` [RFC PATCH v1 3/6] drm/tegra: Avoid implicit DMA backing with IOMMU Dmitry Osipenko
2018-07-26 23:16 ` [RFC PATCH v1 4/6] gpu: host1x: " Dmitry Osipenko
2018-07-26 23:16 ` [RFC PATCH v1 5/6] drm/nouveau: tegra: Universally avoid " Dmitry Osipenko
2018-07-26 23:16 ` [RFC PATCH v1 6/6] Revert "drm/nouveau: tegra: Detach from ARM DMA/IOMMU mapping" Dmitry Osipenko
2018-07-27  8:25 ` [RFC PATCH v1 0/6] Resolve unwanted DMA backing with IOMMU Joerg Roedel
2018-07-27  9:03   ` Will Deacon
2018-07-27 14:10     ` Dmitry Osipenko
2018-07-27 14:20       ` Joerg Roedel
2018-07-27 17:13         ` Rob Herring
2018-07-27 18:31           ` Joerg Roedel
2018-07-27 20:02             ` Dmitry Osipenko [this message]
2018-07-27 16:02       ` Robin Murphy
2018-07-27 17:03         ` Jordan Crouse
2018-07-27 17:16           ` Dmitry Osipenko
2018-07-28 11:40             ` Dmitry Osipenko
2018-08-02 18:24             ` Dmitry Osipenko
2018-08-03 15:43               ` Robin Murphy
2018-08-03 17:00                 ` Jordan Crouse
2018-08-15 19:56                 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2018-08-16 17:23                   ` Robin Murphy
2018-09-20 17:09                     ` Dmitry Osipenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4850389.K9ByBxYttl@dimapc \
    --to=digetx@gmail.com \
    --cc=bskeggs@redhat.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=cyndis@kapsi.fi \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kwizart@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).