From: Niel Lambrechts <niel.lambrechts@gmail.com>
To: "linux.kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:36:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49F57C8C.4010105@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cviZC-6ap-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
On 04/26/2009 10:20 PM, Nico Schottelius wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki [Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 11:46:25AM +0200]:
>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>> of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
>
> Sure, still broken. For some version it works, for most newer not,
> as reported.
>
> Can we stop that nag-service and spent time in fixing it better?
You should rather be quiet about the time people are investing in this
community, especially when others strongly differ from you the merit of
that service.
Without Rafael's reports some of the regressions I have posted probably
would have not been investigated at all.
Niel
--
next parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-27 9:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <cvbEH-2YF-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <cvbOn-3b0-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <cviZC-6ap-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
2009-04-27 9:36 ` Niel Lambrechts [this message]
2009-06-07 10:02 2.6.30-rc8-git4: Reported regressions 2.6.28 -> 2.6.29 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-07 10:06 ` [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc Rafael J. Wysocki
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-05-30 19:50 2.6.30-rc7-git4: Reported regressions 2.6.28 -> 2.6.29 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-30 19:55 ` [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-24 19:27 2.6.30-rc7: Reported regressions 2.6.28 -> 2.6.29 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-24 19:31 ` [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-16 19:58 2.6.30-rc6: Reported regressions 2.6.28 -> 2.6.29 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-16 20:05 ` [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-04-26 9:42 2.6.30-rc3-git1: Reported regressions 2.6.28 -> 2.6.29 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-04-26 9:46 ` [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-04-26 20:15 ` Nico Schottelius
2009-04-26 23:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-04-30 8:00 ` Nico Schottelius
2009-04-06 18:54 2.6.29-git13: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-04-06 19:05 ` [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-04-07 4:12 ` Len Brown
2009-04-07 21:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
[not found] ` <20090417143532.GA6195@ikn.schottelius.org>
2009-04-20 10:36 ` Nico Schottelius
2009-03-21 16:28 2.6.29-rc8-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-21 16:39 ` [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-14 19:01 2.6.29-rc8: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-14 19:05 ` [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:22 2.6.29-rc6-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-04 6:43 ` Nico Schottelius
2009-03-07 21:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-04-04 4:25 ` Len Brown
2009-02-23 21:45 2.6.29-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-23 21:48 ` [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-24 5:47 ` Nico Schottelius
2009-02-25 23:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-14 20:35 2.6.29-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-14 20:38 ` [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-15 13:43 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-02-15 14:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-17 23:05 ` Eric Anholt
2009-02-17 23:13 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-02-17 23:23 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-02-18 9:36 ` Nico Schottelius
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49F57C8C.4010105@gmail.com \
--to=niel.lambrechts@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).