From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1757446Ab1FFPDq (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 6 Jun 2011 11:03:46 -0400
Received: from r00tworld.com ([212.85.137.150]:60030 "EHLO r00tworld.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1755899Ab1FFPDp (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 6 Jun 2011 11:03:45 -0400
From: pageexec@freemail.hu
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 17:01:42 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 9/9] x86-64: Add CONFIG_UNSAFE_VSYSCALLS to feature-removal-schedule
Reply-to: pageexec@freemail.hu
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@mit.edu>,
        x86@kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
        Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>,
        richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com>,
        Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
        Louis Rilling <Louis.Rilling@kerlabs.com>, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Message-ID: <4DECEBD6.10522.12F3E13C@pageexec.freemail.hu>
In-reply-to: <20110606144414.GA30348@elte.hu>
References: <cover.1307292171.git.luto@mit.edu>, <4DECAE68.16683.1203EBBB@pageexec.freemail.hu>, <20110606144414.GA30348@elte.hu>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.61)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-description: Mail message body
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.1.12 (r00tworld.com [212.85.137.150]); Mon, 06 Jun 2011 17:02:16 +0200 (CEST)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 6 Jun 2011 at 16:44, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> You have not replied to that mail of
> mine so can i assume that you concur and accept my points?

my bandwidth/quota for replying to idiocy is limited (and is
close to exhaustion for today ;), be patient, i'll reply to
you as well.