From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932380Ab1GMDVo (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2011 23:21:44 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:55077 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932349Ab1GMDVn (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2011 23:21:43 -0400 Message-ID: <4E1D0F33.7020708@zytor.com> Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 20:21:23 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc15 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yinghai Lu CC: Tejun Heo , mingo@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, benh@kernel.crashing.org, davem@davemloft.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHSET x86/mm] memblock, x86: Allow node info in memblock and remove x86 specific memblock code References: <1310462166-31469-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/12/2011 04:26 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote: > > that is great, merge early_node_map into memblock array. > > looks it comes with some mismatch section warning... > I'm also confused about the baseline of the patchset... -hpa