From: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
"David Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Linux Kernel Network Developers" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linuxarm@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: sch_generic: aviod concurrent reset and enqueue op for lockless qdisc
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2020 16:10:51 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5223daf1-a7a2-5d20-7dde-b5b6284f8e02@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1c01f9e0-fde4-a8ee-caa3-598738a9a98d@gmail.com>
On 2020/9/3 15:24, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
>
> On 9/2/20 6:14 PM, Yunsheng Lin wrote:
>
>>
>> It seems semantics for some_qdisc_is_busy() is changed, which does not only do
>> the checking, but also do the reseting?
>
> Yes, obviously, we would have to rename to a better name.
>
>>
>> Also, qdisc_reset() could be called multi times for the same qdisc if some_qdisc_is_busy()
>> return true multi times?
>
> This should not matter, qdisc_reset() can be called multiple times,
> as we also call it from qdisc_destroy() anyway.
How about the below patch, which does not need to change the semantics
for some_qdisc_is_busy() and avoid calling qdisc_reset() multi times?
diff --git a/net/sched/sch_generic.c b/net/sched/sch_generic.c
index 265a61d..ce9031c 100644
--- a/net/sched/sch_generic.c
+++ b/net/sched/sch_generic.c
@@ -1131,24 +1131,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(dev_activate);
static void qdisc_deactivate(struct Qdisc *qdisc)
{
- bool nolock = qdisc->flags & TCQ_F_NOLOCK;
-
- if (qdisc->flags & TCQ_F_BUILTIN)
- return;
- if (test_bit(__QDISC_STATE_DEACTIVATED, &qdisc->state))
- return;
-
- if (nolock)
- spin_lock_bh(&qdisc->seqlock);
- spin_lock_bh(qdisc_lock(qdisc));
-
set_bit(__QDISC_STATE_DEACTIVATED, &qdisc->state);
-
- qdisc_reset(qdisc);
-
- spin_unlock_bh(qdisc_lock(qdisc));
- if (nolock)
- spin_unlock_bh(&qdisc->seqlock);
}
static void dev_deactivate_queue(struct net_device *dev,
@@ -1165,6 +1148,33 @@ static void dev_deactivate_queue(struct net_device *dev,
}
}
+static void dev_reset_qdisc(struct net_device *dev)
+{
+ unsigned int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < dev->num_tx_queues; i++) {
+ struct netdev_queue *dev_queue;
+ struct Qdisc *q;
+ bool nolock;
+
+ dev_queue = netdev_get_tx_queue(dev, i);
+ q = dev_queue->qdisc_sleeping;
+ nolock = q->flags & TCQ_F_NOLOCK;
+
+ if (nolock)
+ spin_lock_bh(&q->seqlock);
+
+ spin_lock_bh(qdisc_lock(q));
+
+ qdisc_reset(q);
+
+ spin_unlock_bh(qdisc_lock(q));
+
+ if (nolock)
+ spin_unlock_bh(&q->seqlock);
+ }
+}
+
static bool some_qdisc_is_busy(struct net_device *dev)
{
unsigned int i;
@@ -1219,6 +1229,9 @@ void dev_deactivate_many(struct list_head *head)
*/
synchronize_net();
+ list_for_each_entry(dev, head, close_list)
+ dev_reset_qdisc(dev);
+
/* Wait for outstanding qdisc_run calls. */
list_for_each_entry(dev, head, close_list) {
while (some_qdisc_is_busy(dev)) {
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-04 8:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-01 0:55 [PATCH net-next] net: sch_generic: aviod concurrent reset and enqueue op for lockless qdisc Yunsheng Lin
2020-09-01 6:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2020-09-01 7:27 ` Yunsheng Lin
2020-09-01 18:34 ` David Miller
2020-09-02 1:43 ` Yunsheng Lin
2020-09-01 18:24 ` Cong Wang
2020-09-02 1:42 ` Yunsheng Lin
2020-09-02 4:41 ` Cong Wang
2020-09-02 6:34 ` Yunsheng Lin
2020-09-02 7:32 ` Eric Dumazet
2020-09-02 8:14 ` Yunsheng Lin
2020-09-02 9:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2020-09-03 1:14 ` Yunsheng Lin
2020-09-03 7:24 ` Eric Dumazet
2020-09-04 8:10 ` Yunsheng Lin [this message]
2020-09-03 0:35 ` Cong Wang
2020-09-03 1:21 ` Yunsheng Lin
2020-09-03 1:48 ` Cong Wang
2020-09-03 2:22 ` Yunsheng Lin
2020-09-03 2:53 ` Cong Wang
2020-09-04 1:30 ` John Fastabend
2020-09-04 8:08 ` Yunsheng Lin
2020-09-06 8:52 ` [net] 6fd0d0dede: hwsim.ap_ht40_5ghz_switch.fail kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5223daf1-a7a2-5d20-7dde-b5b6284f8e02@huawei.com \
--to=linyunsheng@huawei.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).