From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, "David Woodhouse" <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
"Joerg Roedel" <joro@8bytes.org>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Michał Wajdeczko" <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] iommu/vt-d: Fix IOMMU field not populated on device hot re-plug
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2019 09:29:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52fbfac9-c879-4b45-dd74-fafe62c2432b@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1769080.0GM3UzqXcv@jkrzyszt-desk.ger.corp.intel.com>
Hi Janusz,
On 9/2/19 4:37 PM, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
>> I am not saying that keeping data is not acceptable. I just want to
>> check whether there are any other solutions.
> Then reverting 458b7c8e0dde and applying this patch still resolves the issue
> for me. No errors appear when mappings are unmapped on device close after the
> device has been removed, and domain info preserved on device removal is
> successfully reused on device re-plug.
This patch doesn't look good to me although I agree that keeping data is
acceptable. It updates dev->archdata.iommu, but leaves the hardware
context/pasid table unchanged. This might cause problems somewhere.
>
> Is there anything else I can do to help?
Can you please tell me how to reproduce the problem? Keeping the per
device domain info while device is unplugged is a bit dangerous because
info->dev might be a wild pointer. We need to work out a clean fix.
>
> Thanks,
> Janusz
>
Best regards,
Baolu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-03 1:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-22 14:29 [RFC PATCH] iommu/vt-d: Fix IOMMU field not populated on device hot re-plug Janusz Krzysztofik
2019-08-23 1:51 ` Lu Baolu
2019-08-26 8:15 ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2019-08-26 8:29 ` Lu Baolu
2019-08-27 9:35 ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2019-08-28 0:56 ` Lu Baolu
2019-08-28 14:17 ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2019-08-29 1:43 ` Lu Baolu
2019-08-29 7:58 ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2019-08-29 9:08 ` Lu Baolu
2019-09-02 8:37 ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2019-09-03 1:29 ` Lu Baolu [this message]
2019-09-03 7:41 ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2019-10-01 15:01 ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2019-10-08 2:27 ` Lu Baolu
2019-10-11 6:54 ` Lu Baolu
2019-10-11 10:27 ` Janusz Krzysztofik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52fbfac9-c879-4b45-dd74-fafe62c2432b@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).