From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Linux-Next <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 30 (clk related WARNING on arm)
Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2015 10:49:54 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54CE7552.9070600@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdV64QF=WNxOgFn3mzpSCrA8amr6wrWQJFaZsUYozTVW=Q@mail.gmail.com>
On 02/01/2015 01:23 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 8:07 PM, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 06:02:09PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Changes since 20150129:
>>>
>>> The arm-soc gained conflicts against the arm-current and arm trees.
>>>
>>> The spi tree gained a build failure for which I reverted a commit.
>>>
>>> Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 6300
>>> 6348 files changed, 255117 insertions(+), 131620 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>> I see the following runtime warning repeatedly (with different call
>> paths to vexpress_osc_round_rate) with my qemu vexpress test.
>>
>> Bisect points to commit cb75a8fcd14e71 ("clk: Add rate constraints to clocks").
>>
>> Guenter
>>
>> ---
>> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at drivers/clk/versatile/clk-vexpress-osc.c:47
>> vexpress_osc_round_rate+0x58/0x64()
>
> See also the thread started at
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-doc/msg28017.html
>
> Will try the patch after FOSDEM.
>
Hi Geert,
thanks a lot for the pointer.
Stephen Boyd's patch ("clk: Assign a requested rate by default")
fixes the problem seen in my test. Stephen, please feel free to add
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
to that patch.
Thanks,
Guenter
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-01 18:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-30 7:02 linux-next: Tree for Jan 30 Stephen Rothwell
2015-01-30 14:25 ` linux-next: Tree for Jan 30 (build failures) Guenter Roeck
2015-01-30 16:01 ` Oleksij Rempel
2015-01-30 17:30 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-01-31 8:13 ` [PATCH] ARM: clocksource: whitelist asm9260_timer driver for ARM Oleksij Rempel
2015-01-30 16:15 ` linux-next: Tree for Jan 30 (build failures) Boris Brezillon
2015-01-30 19:07 ` linux-next: Tree for Jan 30 (clk related WARNING on arm) Guenter Roeck
2015-02-01 9:23 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-02-01 18:49 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54CE7552.9070600@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).