From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] x86/mm/pti: Handle unaligned address gracefully in pti_clone_pagetable()
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 08:46:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55bb026c-5d54-6ebf-608f-3f376fbec4e5@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190828143123.971884723@linutronix.de>
On 8/28/19 7:24 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> From: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
>
> pti_clone_pmds() assumes that the supplied address is either:
>
> - properly PUD/PMD aligned
> or
> - the address is actually mapped which means that independent
> of the mapping level (PUD/PMD/PTE) the next higher mapping
> exist.
>
> If that's not the case the unaligned address can be incremented by PUD or
> PMD size wrongly. All callers supply mapped and/or aligned addresses, but
> for robustness sake, it's better to handle that case proper and to emit a
> warning.
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Song, did you ever root-cause the performance regression? I thought
there were still some mysteries there.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-28 15:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-28 14:24 [patch 0/2] x86/mm/pti: Robustness updates Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-28 14:24 ` [patch 1/2] x86/mm/pti: Handle unaligned address gracefully in pti_clone_pagetable() Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-28 15:46 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2019-08-28 15:51 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-28 17:58 ` Song Liu
2019-08-28 20:05 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-28 20:32 ` Song Liu
2019-08-28 22:31 ` [PATCH] x86/mm/cpa: Prevent large page split when ftrace flips RW on kernel text Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-28 23:03 ` Song Liu
2019-08-29 13:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-29 18:55 ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-28 18:58 ` [patch 1/2] x86/mm/pti: Handle unaligned address gracefully in pti_clone_pagetable() Ingo Molnar
2019-08-28 19:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-28 20:54 ` [patch V2 " Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-28 21:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-28 21:54 ` [patch V3 " Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-28 23:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-08-29 19:02 ` [tip: x86/pti] " tip-bot2 for Song Liu
2019-08-30 10:24 ` [patch V3 1/2] " Joerg Roedel
2019-08-28 14:24 ` [patch 2/2] x86/mm/pti: Do not invoke PTI functions when PTI is disabled Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-28 15:47 ` Dave Hansen
2019-08-28 17:49 ` Song Liu
2019-08-28 19:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-08-29 19:02 ` [tip: x86/pti] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-30 10:25 ` [patch 2/2] " Joerg Roedel
2019-08-28 16:03 ` [patch 0/2] x86/mm/pti: Robustness updates Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55bb026c-5d54-6ebf-608f-3f376fbec4e5@intel.com \
--to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).