From: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
arnd@arndb.de, hughd@google.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] x86, pkeys: add fault handling for PF_PK page fault bit
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 08:42:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <577E7848.3060908@sr71.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160707144027.GX11498@techsingularity.net>
On 07/07/2016 07:40 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 05:47:20AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
>> From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
>> PF_PK means that a memory access violated the protection key
>> access restrictions. It is unconditionally an access_error()
>> because the permissions set on the VMA don't matter (the PKRU
>> value overrides it), and we never "resolve" PK faults (like
>> how a COW can "resolve write fault).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
>
> An access fault gets propgated as SEGV_PKUERR. What happens if glibc
> does not recognise it?
It passes it through to the handler without any side-effects. I don't
think it does anything differently with SEGV_* codes that it knows about
vs. unknown ones. The only negative side-effect that I can think of is
that it won't have a nice error message for it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-07 15:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-07 12:47 [PATCH 0/9] [REVIEW-REQUEST] [v4] System Calls for Memory Protection Keys Dave Hansen
2016-07-07 12:47 ` [PATCH 1/9] x86, pkeys: add fault handling for PF_PK page fault bit Dave Hansen
2016-07-07 14:40 ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-07 15:42 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2016-07-07 12:47 ` [PATCH 2/9] mm: implement new pkey_mprotect() system call Dave Hansen
2016-07-07 14:40 ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-07 16:51 ` Dave Hansen
2016-07-08 10:15 ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-07 12:47 ` [PATCH 3/9] x86, pkeys: make mprotect_key() mask off additional vm_flags Dave Hansen
2016-07-07 12:47 ` [PATCH 4/9] x86: wire up mprotect_key() system call Dave Hansen
2016-07-07 12:47 ` [PATCH 5/9] x86, pkeys: allocation/free syscalls Dave Hansen
2016-07-07 14:40 ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-07 15:38 ` Dave Hansen
2016-07-07 12:47 ` [PATCH 6/9] x86, pkeys: add pkey set/get syscalls Dave Hansen
2016-07-07 14:45 ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-07 17:33 ` Dave Hansen
2016-07-08 7:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-07-08 16:32 ` Dave Hansen
2016-07-09 8:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-07-11 4:25 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-11 7:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-07-11 14:28 ` Dave Hansen
2016-07-12 7:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-07-12 15:39 ` Dave Hansen
2016-07-11 14:50 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-11 14:34 ` Dave Hansen
2016-07-11 14:45 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-11 15:48 ` Dave Hansen
2016-07-12 16:32 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-12 17:12 ` Dave Hansen
2016-07-12 22:55 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-13 7:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-07-13 18:43 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-14 8:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-07-18 4:43 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-18 9:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-07-18 18:02 ` Dave Hansen
2016-07-18 20:12 ` Dave Hansen
2016-07-08 19:26 ` Dave Hansen
2016-07-08 10:22 ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-07 12:47 ` [PATCH 7/9] generic syscalls: wire up memory protection keys syscalls Dave Hansen
2016-07-07 12:47 ` [PATCH 8/9] pkeys: add details of system call use to Documentation/ Dave Hansen
2016-07-07 12:47 ` [PATCH 9/9] x86, pkeys: add self-tests Dave Hansen
2016-07-07 14:47 ` [PATCH 0/9] [REVIEW-REQUEST] [v4] System Calls for Memory Protection Keys Mel Gorman
2016-07-08 18:38 ` Hugh Dickins
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-06-09 0:01 [PATCH 0/9] [v3] " Dave Hansen
2016-06-09 0:01 ` [PATCH 1/9] x86, pkeys: add fault handling for PF_PK page fault bit Dave Hansen
2016-06-07 20:47 [PATCH 0/9] [v2] System Calls for Memory Protection Keys Dave Hansen
2016-06-07 20:47 ` [PATCH 1/9] x86, pkeys: add fault handling for PF_PK page fault bit Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=577E7848.3060908@sr71.net \
--to=dave@sr71.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).