linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
To: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>,
	<bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>, <ohad@wizery.com>
Cc: <linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>,
	<benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 12/17] remoteproc: modify vring allocation to rely on centralized carveout allocator
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 19:14:22 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <59fad1e3-11a2-939e-c47e-4351fb636e2d@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1532697292-14272-13-git-send-email-loic.pallardy@st.com>

On 7/27/18 8:14 AM, Loic Pallardy wrote:
> Current version of rproc_alloc_vring function supports only dynamic vring
> allocation.
> 
> This patch allows to allocate vrings based on memory region declatation.
> Vrings are now manage like memory carveouts, to communize memory management
> code in rproc_alloc_registered_carveouts().
> 
> Allocated buffer is retrieved in rp_find_vq() thanks to
> rproc_find_carveout_by_name() functions for.
> 
> This patch sets vrings names to vdev"x"vring"y" with x vdev index in
> resource table and y vring index in vdev. This will be updated when
> name will be associated to vdev in firmware resource table.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c     | 61 +++++++++++++++++---------------
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h |  2 ++
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c   | 14 +++++++-
>  include/linux/remoteproc.h               |  6 ++--
>  4 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index c543d04..4edc6f0 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -53,6 +53,11 @@ typedef int (*rproc_handle_resources_t)(struct rproc *rproc,
>  typedef int (*rproc_handle_resource_t)(struct rproc *rproc,
>  				 void *, int offset, int avail);
>  
> +static int rproc_alloc_carveout(struct rproc *rproc,
> +				struct rproc_mem_entry *mem);
> +static int rproc_release_carveout(struct rproc *rproc,
> +				  struct rproc_mem_entry *mem);
> +
>  /* Unique indices for remoteproc devices */
>  static DEFINE_IDA(rproc_dev_index);
>  
> @@ -312,21 +317,33 @@ int rproc_alloc_vring(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, int i)
>  	struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
>  	struct rproc_vring *rvring = &rvdev->vring[i];
>  	struct fw_rsc_vdev *rsc;
> -	dma_addr_t dma;
> -	void *va;
>  	int ret, size, notifyid;
> +	struct rproc_mem_entry *mem;
>  
>  	/* actual size of vring (in bytes) */
>  	size = PAGE_ALIGN(vring_size(rvring->len, rvring->align));
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * Allocate non-cacheable memory for the vring. In the future
> -	 * this call will also configure the IOMMU for us
> -	 */
> -	va = dma_alloc_coherent(dev->parent, size, &dma, GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!va) {
> -		dev_err(dev->parent, "dma_alloc_coherent failed\n");
> -		return -EINVAL;
> +	rsc = (void *)rproc->table_ptr + rvdev->rsc_offset;
> +
> +	/* Search for pre-registered carveout */
> +	mem = rproc_find_carveout_by_name(rproc, "vdev%dvring%d", rvdev->index,
> +					  i);
> +	if (mem) {
> +		if (rproc_check_carveout_da(rproc, mem, rsc->vring[i].da, size))
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +	} else {
> +		/* Register carveout in in list */
> +		mem = rproc_mem_entry_init(dev, 0, 0, size, rsc->vring[i].da,
> +					   rproc_alloc_carveout,
> +					   rproc_release_carveout,
> +					   "vdev%dvring%d",
> +					   rvdev->index, i);
> +		if (!mem) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "Can't allocate memory entry structure\n");
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +		}
> +
> +		rproc_add_carveout(rproc, mem);
>  	}
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -337,7 +354,6 @@ int rproc_alloc_vring(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, int i)
>  	ret = idr_alloc(&rproc->notifyids, rvring, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (ret < 0) {
>  		dev_err(dev, "idr_alloc failed: %d\n", ret);
> -		dma_free_coherent(dev->parent, size, va, dma);
>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  	notifyid = ret;
> @@ -346,21 +362,9 @@ int rproc_alloc_vring(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, int i)
>  	if (notifyid > rproc->max_notifyid)
>  		rproc->max_notifyid = notifyid;
>  
> -	dev_dbg(dev, "vring%d: va %pK dma %pad size 0x%x idr %d\n",
> -		i, va, &dma, size, notifyid);
> -
> -	rvring->va = va;
> -	rvring->dma = dma;
>  	rvring->notifyid = notifyid;
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * Let the rproc know the notifyid and da of this vring.
> -	 * Not all platforms use dma_alloc_coherent to automatically
> -	 * set up the iommu. In this case the device address (da) will
> -	 * hold the physical address and not the device address.
> -	 */
> -	rsc = (void *)rproc->table_ptr + rvdev->rsc_offset;
> -	rsc->vring[i].da = dma;
> +	/* Let the rproc know the notifyid of this vring.*/
>  	rsc->vring[i].notifyid = notifyid;
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -392,12 +396,10 @@ int rproc_alloc_vring(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, int i)
>  
>  void rproc_free_vring(struct rproc_vring *rvring)
>  {
> -	int size = PAGE_ALIGN(vring_size(rvring->len, rvring->align));
>  	struct rproc *rproc = rvring->rvdev->rproc;
>  	int idx = rvring->rvdev->vring - rvring;
>  	struct fw_rsc_vdev *rsc;
>  
> -	dma_free_coherent(rproc->dev.parent, size, rvring->va, rvring->dma);
>  	idr_remove(&rproc->notifyids, rvring->notifyid);

Also, I am not sure if FW_RSC_ADDR_ANY semantics were enforced
previously on the vring da. It was simply overwritten irrespective of
the value. Now, I am running again into the "bad carveout rsc
configuration value" due to the iommu_domain_check if !FW_RSC_ADDR_ANY.

FWIW, the rproc_free_vring was actually using the value 0 when resetting.

regards
Suman

>  
>  	/* reset resource entry info */
> @@ -484,6 +486,7 @@ static int rproc_handle_vdev(struct rproc *rproc, struct fw_rsc_vdev *rsc,
>  
>  	rvdev->id = rsc->id;
>  	rvdev->rproc = rproc;
> +	rvdev->index = rproc->nb_vdev++;
>  
>  	/* parse the vrings */
>  	for (i = 0; i < rsc->num_of_vrings; i++) {
> @@ -528,9 +531,6 @@ void rproc_vdev_release(struct kref *ref)
>  
>  	for (id = 0; id < ARRAY_SIZE(rvdev->vring); id++) {
>  		rvring = &rvdev->vring[id];
> -		if (!rvring->va)
> -			continue;
> -
>  		rproc_free_vring(rvring);
>  	}
>  
> @@ -1322,6 +1322,9 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
>  	/* reset max_notifyid */
>  	rproc->max_notifyid = -1;
>  
> +	/* reset handled vdev */
> +	rproc->nb_vdev = 0;
> +
>  	/* handle fw resources which are required to boot rproc */
>  	ret = rproc_handle_resources(rproc, rproc_loading_handlers);
>  	if (ret) {
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> index 7570beb..f6cad24 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> @@ -60,6 +60,8 @@ struct dentry *rproc_create_trace_file(const char *name, struct rproc *rproc,
>  int rproc_elf_load_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
>  struct resource_table *rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc,
>  						       const struct firmware *fw);
> +struct rproc_mem_entry *
> +rproc_find_carveout_by_name(struct rproc *rproc, const char *name, ...);
>  
>  static inline
>  int rproc_fw_sanity_check(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
> index bbecd44..de21f62 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
> @@ -76,7 +76,9 @@ static struct virtqueue *rp_find_vq(struct virtio_device *vdev,
>  	struct rproc_vdev *rvdev = vdev_to_rvdev(vdev);
>  	struct rproc *rproc = vdev_to_rproc(vdev);
>  	struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
> +	struct rproc_mem_entry *mem;
>  	struct rproc_vring *rvring;
> +	struct fw_rsc_vdev *rsc;
>  	struct virtqueue *vq;
>  	void *addr;
>  	int len, size;
> @@ -88,8 +90,14 @@ static struct virtqueue *rp_find_vq(struct virtio_device *vdev,
>  	if (!name)
>  		return NULL;
>  
> +	/* Search allocated memory region by name */
> +	mem = rproc_find_carveout_by_name(rproc, "vdev%dvring%d", rvdev->index,
> +					  id);
> +	if (!mem || !mem->va)
> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
>  	rvring = &rvdev->vring[id];
> -	addr = rvring->va;
> +	addr = mem->va;
>  	len = rvring->len;
>  
>  	/* zero vring */
> @@ -114,6 +122,10 @@ static struct virtqueue *rp_find_vq(struct virtio_device *vdev,
>  	rvring->vq = vq;
>  	vq->priv = rvring;
>  
> +	/* Update vring in resource table */
> +	rsc = (void *)rproc->table_ptr + rvdev->rsc_offset;
> +	rsc->vring[id].da = mem->da;
> +
>  	return vq;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> index 4cdd0c6..6b3a234 100644
> --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> @@ -453,6 +453,7 @@ struct rproc_dump_segment {
>   * @table_sz: size of @cached_table
>   * @has_iommu: flag to indicate if remote processor is behind an MMU
>   * @dump_segments: list of segments in the firmware
> + * @nb_vdev: number of vdev currently handled by rproc
>   */
>  struct rproc {
>  	struct list_head node;
> @@ -485,6 +486,7 @@ struct rproc {
>  	bool has_iommu;
>  	bool auto_boot;
>  	struct list_head dump_segments;
> +	int nb_vdev;
>  };
>  
>  /**
> @@ -512,7 +514,6 @@ struct rproc_subdev {
>  /**
>   * struct rproc_vring - remoteproc vring state
>   * @va:	virtual address
> - * @dma: dma address
>   * @len: length, in bytes
>   * @da: device address
>   * @align: vring alignment
> @@ -522,7 +523,6 @@ struct rproc_subdev {
>   */
>  struct rproc_vring {
>  	void *va;
> -	dma_addr_t dma;
>  	int len;
>  	u32 da;
>  	u32 align;
> @@ -541,6 +541,7 @@ struct rproc_vring {
>   * @vdev: the virio device
>   * @vring: the vrings for this vdev
>   * @rsc_offset: offset of the vdev's resource entry
> + * @index: vdev position versus other vdev declared in resource table
>   */
>  struct rproc_vdev {
>  	struct kref refcount;
> @@ -553,6 +554,7 @@ struct rproc_vdev {
>  	struct virtio_device vdev;
>  	struct rproc_vring vring[RVDEV_NUM_VRINGS];
>  	u32 rsc_offset;
> +	u32 index;
>  };
>  
>  struct rproc *rproc_get_by_phandle(phandle phandle);
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-10-24  2:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-27 13:14 [PATCH v4 00/17] remoteproc: add fixed memory region support Loic Pallardy
2018-07-27 13:14 ` [PATCH v4 01/17] remoteproc: configure IOMMU only if device address requested Loic Pallardy
2018-10-23 17:25   ` Suman Anna
2018-10-23 19:40     ` Loic PALLARDY
2018-10-24  3:46       ` Suman Anna
2018-10-24 12:56         ` Loic PALLARDY
2018-10-26  0:46           ` Suman Anna
2018-07-27 13:14 ` [PATCH v4 02/17] remoteproc: add rproc_va_to_pa function Loic Pallardy
2018-10-23 16:50   ` Suman Anna
2018-10-23 19:51     ` Loic PALLARDY
2018-10-24  3:19       ` Suman Anna
2018-10-24 12:58         ` Loic PALLARDY
2018-10-25 22:50           ` Suman Anna
2018-07-27 13:14 ` [PATCH v4 03/17] remoteproc: add release ops in rproc_mem_entry struct Loic Pallardy
2018-10-23 16:53   ` Suman Anna
2018-10-23 20:48     ` Suman Anna
2018-07-27 13:14 ` [PATCH v4 04/17] remoteproc: add name " Loic Pallardy
2018-10-23 17:06   ` Suman Anna
2018-07-27 13:14 ` [PATCH v4 05/17] remoteproc: add helper function to allocate and init " Loic Pallardy
2018-10-23 19:24   ` Suman Anna
2018-07-27 13:14 ` [PATCH v4 06/17] remoteproc: introduce rproc_add_carveout function Loic Pallardy
2018-10-23 17:05   ` Suman Anna
2018-10-23 19:48     ` Loic PALLARDY
2018-07-27 13:14 ` [PATCH v4 07/17] remoteproc: introduce rproc_find_carveout_by_name function Loic Pallardy
2018-10-23 19:28   ` Suman Anna
2018-07-27 13:14 ` [PATCH v4 08/17] remoteproc: add alloc ops in rproc_mem_entry struct Loic Pallardy
2018-10-23 21:20   ` Suman Anna
2018-10-24 16:00     ` Loic PALLARDY
2018-10-25 22:37       ` Suman Anna
2018-07-27 13:14 ` [PATCH v4 09/17] remoteproc: add helper function to allocate rproc_mem_entry from reserved memory Loic Pallardy
2018-07-27 13:14 ` [PATCH v4 10/17] remoteproc: add helper function to check carveout device address Loic Pallardy
2018-10-23 22:14   ` Suman Anna
2018-10-24 15:24     ` Loic PALLARDY
2018-10-25 22:50       ` Suman Anna
2018-07-27 13:14 ` [PATCH v4 11/17] remoteproc: modify rproc_handle_carveout to support pre-registered region Loic Pallardy
2018-07-27 13:14 ` [PATCH v4 12/17] remoteproc: modify vring allocation to rely on centralized carveout allocator Loic Pallardy
2018-10-10  5:32   ` Bjorn Andersson
2018-10-10 18:58     ` Loic PALLARDY
2018-10-15  6:40       ` Bjorn Andersson
2018-10-23 23:24         ` Suman Anna
2018-10-24  0:14   ` Suman Anna [this message]
2018-10-24 15:14     ` Loic PALLARDY
2018-10-29 20:17       ` Suman Anna
2018-12-04 17:56         ` Wendy Liang
2018-12-04 18:04           ` Loic PALLARDY
2018-12-04 18:58             ` Wendy Liang
2018-12-04 19:57               ` Loic PALLARDY
2018-12-04 21:24                 ` Wendy Liang
2018-07-27 13:14 ` [PATCH v4 13/17] remoteproc: create vdev subdevice with specific dma memory pool Loic Pallardy
2018-09-27 17:17   ` Wendy Liang
2018-09-27 19:22     ` Loic PALLARDY
2018-09-27 20:18       ` Wendy Liang
2018-10-24  1:22         ` Suman Anna
2018-10-24  1:48           ` Suman Anna
2018-10-24 12:42             ` Loic PALLARDY
2018-10-25 22:06               ` Suman Anna
2018-10-24 12:40           ` Loic PALLARDY
2018-10-25 20:16             ` Suman Anna
2018-10-10  5:58   ` Bjorn Andersson
2018-10-10 19:17     ` Loic PALLARDY
2018-10-24  1:27       ` Suman Anna
2018-07-27 13:14 ` [PATCH v4 14/17] remoteproc: keystone: declare reserved memory region for vdev device Loic Pallardy
2018-07-27 13:14 ` [PATCH v4 15/17] remoteproc: da8xx: " Loic Pallardy
2018-10-24  2:57   ` Suman Anna
2018-10-24 13:19     ` Loic PALLARDY
2018-10-25 22:11       ` Suman Anna
2018-07-27 13:14 ` [PATCH v4 16/17] remoteproc: st: add reserved memory support Loic Pallardy
2018-10-24  3:01   ` Suman Anna
2018-10-24 12:37     ` Loic PALLARDY
2018-07-27 13:14 ` [PATCH v4 17/17] rpmsg: virtio: allocate buffer from parent Loic Pallardy
2018-09-28  7:56   ` Anup Patel
2018-09-21  6:04 ` [PATCH v4 00/17] remoteproc: add fixed memory region support Anup Patel
2018-09-26 16:00   ` Loic PALLARDY
2018-09-28  7:54     ` Anup Patel
2018-10-23 16:42 ` Suman Anna

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=59fad1e3-11a2-939e-c47e-4351fb636e2d@ti.com \
    --to=s-anna@ti.com \
    --cc=arnaud.pouliquen@st.com \
    --cc=benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=loic.pallardy@st.com \
    --cc=ohad@wizery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).