From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>,
"'Alexey Dobriyan'" <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: pad assembly functions with INT3
Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 11:53:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5c6762fe-5cbe-42ed-ac4e-a7144b8ef7ad@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20fb84fd5eef4c45b2d38d0290235d5d@AcuMS.aculab.com>
On 05/10/18 09:39, David Laight wrote:
> From: Alexey Dobriyan
>> Sent: 07 May 2018 22:38
>>
>> Use INT3 instead of NOP. All that padding between functions is
>> an illegal area, no legitimate code should jump into it.
>>
>> I've checked x86_64 allyesconfig disassembly, all changes looks sane:
>> INT3 is only used after RET or unconditional JMP.
>
> I thought there was a performance penalty (on at least some cpu)
> depending on the number of and the actual instructions used for padding.
>
> I believe that is why gcc generates a small number of very long 'nop'
> instructions when padding code.
>
There is a performance penalty for using NOP instructions *in the
fallthrough case.* In the case where the padding is never supposed to
be executed, which is what we're talking about here, it is irrelevant.
I thought I had filed a gcc enhancement request, but I can't find it
now, so I just filed this:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85751
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-11 18:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-07 21:37 [PATCH] x86: pad assembly functions with INT3 Alexey Dobriyan
2018-05-07 21:41 ` hpa
2018-05-09 16:55 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2018-05-09 19:28 ` H. Peter Anvin
2018-05-10 16:39 ` David Laight
2018-05-11 18:53 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2018-05-14 9:04 ` David Laight
2018-05-14 11:05 ` hpa
2018-05-15 6:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-15 6:59 ` hpa
2018-05-14 12:53 ` [tip:x86/pti] x86/asm: Pad assembly functions with INT3 instructions tip-bot for Alexey Dobriyan
2018-06-17 11:40 ` Mike Galbraith
2018-06-17 12:00 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-06-17 13:38 ` Mike Galbraith
2018-06-17 14:02 ` Mike Galbraith
2018-06-17 19:47 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-06-18 2:34 ` Mike Galbraith
2018-06-23 10:36 ` [PATCH] x86/crypto: Add missing RETs Borislav Petkov
2018-06-23 17:30 ` Ondrej Mosnáček
2018-06-24 7:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-06-24 7:12 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-24 10:15 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-06-24 10:44 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2018-06-25 7:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-06-25 13:19 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-06-26 6:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-06-26 12:31 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-07-05 7:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-07-06 14:06 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-07-06 14:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-07-01 13:19 ` Herbert Xu
2018-07-01 15:24 ` Ondrej Mosnáček
2018-07-01 15:45 ` Herbert Xu
2018-06-19 11:27 ` [tip:x86/pti] x86/asm: Pad assembly functions with INT3 instructions David Laight
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5c6762fe-5cbe-42ed-ac4e-a7144b8ef7ad@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).