From: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@mellanox.com>,
Song Liu <liu.song.a23@gmail.com>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
Mike Travis <mike.travis@hpe.com>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 3/8] x86/apic: Provide apic_ack_irq()
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2018 16:18:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5db4a904-5ae4-fb1e-ff10-0ac6c1479ccd@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1806061003310.1584@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Hi Thomas,
At 06/06/2018 04:04 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Jun 2018, Dou Liyang wrote:
>
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>> At 06/05/2018 07:41 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> On Tue, 5 Jun 2018, Dou Liyang wrote:
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + if (unlikely(irqd_is_setaffinity_pending(irqd)))
>>>>
>>>> Affinity pending is also judged in
>>>>
>>>>> + irq_move_irq(irqd);
>>>>
>>>> If we can remove the if(...) statement here
>>>
>>> That requires to fix all call sites in ia64 and that's why I didn't. But
>>
>> I didn't express clearly, I meant remove the if(...) statement from
>> apic_ack_irq(), it doesn't require to fix the call sites in ia64.
>
> I put the check there on purpose as I explained in the changelog:
>
> Making the invocation of irq_move_irq() conditional avoids the out of
> line call if the pending bit is not set.
>
I completely understand now, thank you so much. :-)
Thanks,
dou
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-06 8:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-04 15:33 [patch 3/8] x86/apic: Provide apic_ack_irq() Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-05 7:07 ` Song Liu
2018-06-05 11:31 ` Dou Liyang
2018-06-05 11:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-06 3:48 ` Dou Liyang
2018-06-06 8:04 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-06 8:18 ` Dou Liyang [this message]
2018-06-06 13:31 ` [tip:x86/urgent] genirq/migration: Avoid out of line call if pending is not set tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-06 13:32 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/apic: Provide apic_ack_irq() tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5db4a904-5ae4-fb1e-ff10-0ac6c1479ccd@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=0x7f454c46@gmail.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liu.song.a23@gmail.com \
--cc=mike.travis@hpe.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tariqt@mellanox.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).